Mining unit test cases to synthesize API usage examples. Issue 12 (20th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ghafari, Mohammad; Rubinov, Konstantin; Pourhashem K., Mohammad Mehdi
• Other Names: Khomh Foutse guestEditor.; Lo David guestEditor.; Godfrey Michael W. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of software. Volume 29:Issue 12(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-01-20
• Subjects: API usage examples -- code mining -- traceability -- unit test cases; Software engineering -- Periodicals; Computer software -- Development -- Periodicals; Software maintenance -- Periodicals; 005.1
• DOI: 10.1002/smr.1841
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-7473

Abstract

Abstract: Software developers study and reuse existing source code to understand how to properly use application programming interfaces (APIs). However, manually finding sufficient and adequate code examples for a given API is a difficult and a time‐consuming activity. Existing approaches to find or generate examples assume availability of a reasonable set of client code that uses the API. This assumption does not hold for newly released API libraries, non‐widely used APIs, nor private ones. In this work we reuse the important information that is naturally present in test code to circumvent the lack of usage examples for an API when other sources of client code are not available. We propose an approach for automatically identifying the most representative API uses within each unit test case. We then develop an approach to synthesize API usage examples by extracting relevant statements representing the usage of such APIs. We compare the output of a prototype implementation of our approach to both human‐written examples and to a state‐of‐the‐art approach. The obtained results are encouraging; the examples automatically generated with our approach are superior to the state‐of‐the‐art approach and highly similar to the manually constructed examples.