Advantage, meaning, and pleasure: Reframing the interaction between major‐gift fundraisers and philanthropists. Issue 4 (16th November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mc Loughlin, John
• Other Names: Breeze Beth guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: International journal of nonprofit and voluntary sector marketing. Volume 22:Issue 4(2017:Nov.)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-11-16
• Subjects: Nonprofit organizations -- Marketing -- Periodicals; Marketing -- Periodicals; 658.0480688
• DOI: 10.1002/nvsm.1600
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1465-4520

Abstract

Abstract : The purpose of this paper is to bridge the widening gap between the rapidly growing academic literature on fundraising and the need that practising, reflective fundraisers have for a useable explanatory framework for understanding what are the main forces and motivations shaping the interaction between major‐gift fundraisers and philanthropists (major donors and potential donors), particularly in the so‐called cultivation and solicitation (or Ask) meetings . The author's perspective is that of a fundraising practitioner. The paper sets out the essential characteristics needed in such a framework, contends that we do not yet have such a framework, and concludes by setting out a preliminary, simplifying framework for making sense of the interaction between fundraisers and donors. The purpose is to stimulate practitioners and researchers to rethink and reframe this interaction. It is proposed that the interaction is grounded on the reality that funders (and to some extent, fund‐seekers), like individuals in almost every social interaction, are seeking to maximise advantage, meaning, and pleasure (AMP). This paper argues that the more these three overlap, the stronger their effect.