Bone Ablation without Thermal or Acoustic Mechanical Injury via a Novel Picosecond Infrared Laser (PIRL). (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jowett, Nathan; Wöllmer, Wolfgang; Reimer, Rudolph; Zustin, Jozef; Schumacher, Udo; Wiseman, Paul W.; Mlynarek, Alex M.; Böttcher, Arne; Dalchow, Carsten V.; Lörincz, Balazs B.; Knecht, Rainald; Miller, R. J. Dwayne
• Is Part Of: Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery. Volume 150:Number 3(2014:Mar.)
• Page Start: 385
• Page End: 393
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) -- laser ablation -- cold ablation -- Er:YAG laser -- bone ablation -- ultrafast laser ablation -- bone cutting; Head -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Neck -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51
• DOI: 10.1177/0194599813517213
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0194-5998

Abstract

Background and Objective: A precise means to cut bone without significant thermal or mechanical injury has thus far remained elusive. A novel non-ionizing ultrafast pulsed picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) may provide the solution. Tissue ablation with the PIRL occurs via a photothermal process with thermal and stress confinement, resulting in efficient material ejection greatly enhanced through front surface spallation photomechanical effects. By comparison, the Er:YAG laser (EYL) ablates via photothermal and cavitation-induced photomechanical effects without thermal or acoustic confinement, leading to significant collateral tissue injury. This study compared PIRL and EYL bone ablation by infrared thermography (IRT), environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), and histology. Study Design: Prospective, comparative, ex vivo animal model. Setting: Optics laboratory. Subjects and Methods: Ten circular area defects were ablated in ex vivo chicken humeral cortex using PIRL and EYL at similar average power (~70 mW) under IRT. Following fixation, ESEM and undecalcified light microscopy images were obtained and examined for signs of cellular injury. Results: Peak rise in surface temperature was negligible and lower for PIRL (1.56°C; 95% CI, 0.762-2.366) compared to EYL ablation (12.99°C; 95% CI, 12.189-13.792) ( P < .001). ESEM and light microscopy demonstrated preserved cortical microstructure following PIRL ablation in contrast to diffuse thermal injury seen with EYL ablation. Microfractures were not observed. Conclusion: Ablation of cortical bone using the PIRL generates negligible and significantly less heat than EYL ablation while preserving cortical microstructure. This novel laser has great potential in advancing surgical techniques where precision osseous manipulation is required.