Did you say reference conditions? Ecological and socio-economic perspectives on the European Water Framework Directive. Issue 47 (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bouleau, Gabrielle; Pont, Didier
• Is Part Of: Environmental science & policy. Issue 47(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 32
• Page End: 41
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Water Framework Directive -- Climate change -- Reference conditions -- Bio-indicators -- River restoration -- Legally binding standards -- Open method of coordination -- Ecological modernization; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Sciences de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70561
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-9011

Abstract

Highlights: Reference conditions refer to a stable state, ignoring non-linear and chaotic changes. References were needed to set legally binding standards. The DPSIR framework is based on a mitigation logic, which implies a stable reference. Human activities do not equate pressures; Humans can create landscapes and ecosystems. Setting goals for restoration requires a more adaptive management. Abstract: Reference conditions are a key concept in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). The WFD stipulates that the ecological status of a given water body shall be assessed by quantifying the deviation from a set of reference conditions that represent the stable state of an ecosystem in the absence of significant human disturbance. This concept is subject to criticism from several authors, particularly because underlying ecological concepts are weak and the distinction between natural variability and the effects of anthropogenic activities on ecosystem function will become increasingly artificial. In this paper, a sociologist and an aquatic ecologist examine the origin, successes and limits of the reference conditions concept and raise important questions about applying this concept in practice. We argue that this concept fitted specific needs from different institutions and stakeholders which promoted the WFD. Monitoring practices using this concept require some adaptations. Setting goals for restoration based on reference conditions is more problematic. A more adaptive management approach would be wiser.