Using GPS, accelerometry and heart rate to predict outdoor graded walking energy expenditure. Issue 2 (February 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Müllenheim, P.-Y.; Chaudru, S.; Emily, M.; Gernigon, M.; Mahé, G.; Bickert, S.; Prioux, J.; Noury-Desvaux, B.; Le Faucheur, A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of science and medicine in sport. Volume 21:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 166
• Page End: 172
• Publication Date: 2018-02
• Subjects: Global positioning system -- Accelerometer -- Exercise -- Energy metabolism -- Public health -- Methods; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- physiology -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Sportgeneeskunde; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-2440

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To determine the best method and combination of methods among global positioning system (GPS), accelerometry, and heart rate (HR) for estimating energy expenditure (EE) during level and graded outdoor walking. Design: Thirty adults completed 6-min outdoor walks at speeds of 2.0, 3.5, and 5.0 km h −1 during three randomized outdoor walking sessions: one level walking session and two graded (uphill and downhill) walking sessions on a 3.4% and a 10.4% grade. EE was measured using a portable metabolic system (K4b 2 ). Participants wore a GlobalSat ® DG100 GPS receiver, an ActiGraph™ wGT3X+ accelerometer, and a Polar ® HR monitor. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were tested for EE predictions based on GPS speed and grade, accelerometer counts or HR-related parameters (alone and combined). Root-mean-square error (RMSE) was used to determine the accuracy of the models. Published speed/grade-, count-, and HR-based equations were also cross-validated. Results: According to the LMMs, GPS was as accurate as accelerometry (RMSE = 0.89–0.90 kcal min −1 ) and more accurate than HR (RMSE = 1.20 kcal min −1 ) for estimating EE during level walking; GPS was the most accurate method for estimating EE during both level and uphill (RMSE = 1.34 kcal min −1 )/downhill (RMSE = 0.84 kcal min −1 ) walking; combining methods did not increase the accuracy reached using GPS (or accelerometry for level walking). The cross-validation results were in accordance with the LMMs, except for downhill walking. Conclusions: Our study provides useful information regarding the best method(s) for estimating EE with appropriate equations during level and graded outdoor walking.