The Oxford Union Debate on War in 1933: Rhetoric, Representation, Political Action. (1st April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Haapala, Taru
• Is Part Of: Redescriptions. Volume 20:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 68
• Page End: 84
• Publication Date: 2017-04-01
• Subjects: Oxford Union -- politics -- King and Country -- rhetoric -- representation -- ethos; Political science -- Philosophy -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.7227/R.20.1.5
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2308-0906

Abstract

Abstract : This paper shows how a debate conducted in the Oxford Union, the leading student debating society in Britain, was used to make a point about representation and politics in the national press, and what it means in terms of political action and who can be entitled to make political claims. In 1933 the Union debated a motion "That this House will under no circumstances fight for its King and Country". It was carried by a clear majority, and the scandal it caused called the role of the Union and what it represented into question. It is argued here that there were two rhetorical levels in operation, the rhetoric of representation and the rhetoric of debate. Regarding the former, the Union was blamed in the national press for lacking the representative qualities attributed to it, and regarding the latter, its rules and traditions were defended as part of the functions of a political assembly.