Why do we find ourselves around a yellow star instead of a red star?. Issue 1 (16th May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Haqq-Misra, Jacob; Kopparapu, Ravi Kumar; Wolf, Eric T.
• Is Part Of: International journal of astrobiology. Volume 17:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 77
• Page End: 86
• Publication Date: 2017-05-16
• Subjects: anthropic principle, -- Bayesian inference, -- doomsday argument, -- planetary habitability, -- reference class problem, -- SETI; Exobiology -- Periodicals; 576.83905
• DOI: 10.1017/S1473550417000118
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-5504

Abstract

Abstract: M-dwarf stars are more abundant than G-dwarf stars, so our position as observers on a planet orbiting a G-dwarf raises questions about the suitability of other stellar types for supporting life. If we consider ourselves as typical, in the anthropic sense that our environment is probably a typical one for conscious observers, then we are led to the conclusion that planets orbiting in the habitable zone of G-dwarf stars should be the best place for conscious life to develop. But such a conclusion neglects the possibility that K-dwarfs or M-dwarfs could provide more numerous sites for life to develop, both now and in the future. In this paper we analyse this problem through Bayesian inference to demonstrate that our occurrence around a G-dwarf might be a slight statistical anomaly, but only the sort of chance event that we expect to occur regularly. Even if M-dwarfs provide more numerous habitable planets today and in the future, we still expect mid G- to early K-dwarfs stars to be the most likely place for observers like ourselves. This suggests that observers with similar cognitive capabilities as us are most likely to be found at the present time and place, rather than in the future or around much smaller stars.