Medical complexity and placement outcomes for children in foster care. (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Seltzer, Rebecca R.; Johnson, Sara B.; Minkovitz, Cynthia S.
• Is Part Of: Children and youth services review. Volume 83(2017:Dec.)
• Page Start: 285
• Page End: 293
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: AAP American Academy of Pediatrics -- CSHCN Children with Special Health Care Needs -- CMC Children with Medical Complexity -- US United States -- LOS Length of Stay -- AFCARS Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System -- DHHS Department of Health and Human Services -- SSI Supplemental Security Income -- IEP Individualized Education Plan; Foster care -- Medical complexity -- Disability; Social work with children -- Periodicals; Social work with youth -- Periodicals; Adolescent -- Periodicals; Child Welfare -- Periodicals; Social Work -- Periodicals; Service social aux enfants -- Périodiques; Service social à la jeunesse -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 362.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.11.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0190-7409

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Medical complexity threatens placement stability and permanency outcomes for children in foster care (FC). This study aimed to characterize for US children in FC: 1) medical complexity, using number of diagnosed types of disability as a proxy; 2) demographic and removal characteristics based on level of complexity; and 3) whether increasing levels of complexity were associated with foster care placement outcomes. Methods: The analysis included children in FC, ages 0–21 whose disability status was clinically assessed and documented ( n = 538, 695). Using data from the FY 2014 Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, medical complexity was categorized (0–4 +) based on 5 disability types: emotional, hearing/vision, intellectual, physical, and other. Bivariate analyses (χ 2 tests, Kruskall-Wallis) compared the distribution of demographic and removal characteristics among complexity groups. Multiple logistic regression evaluated relationships between medical complexity and placement outcomes, including length of stay in FC, placement stability, and permanency. Results: Twenty-three percent of the sample had 1 disability type, 7% had 2, 3% had 3, 1% had 4 +, and 67% had no disability. Children with increasing complexity were more likely to be older, older on FC entry, male, Black, non-Hispanic, placed in a group home or institution, have abuse, neglect, and/or child disability/behavior as reason for removal, and have poor placement outcomes. Conclusion: Children in FC with greater medical complexity are at risk for undesirable placement outcomes. By recognizing and addressing the unique needs of this vulnerable population, pediatric providers and child welfare staff may identify strategies to improve placement outcomes. Highlights: Foster youth with greater medical complexity experience longer length of stay. Foster youth with greater medical complexity experience more placement changes. With greater medical complexity they are less likely to have a permanency plan. Potential strategies are discussed for improving outcomes for this population.