Red and processed meat intake and cancer risk: Results from the prospective NutriNet‐Santé cohort study. Issue 2 (16th October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Diallo, Abou; Deschasaux, Mélanie; Latino‐Martel, Paule; Hercberg, Serge; Galan, Pilar; Fassier, Philippine; Allès, Benjamin; Guéraud, Françoise; Pierre, Fabrice H.; Touvier, Mathilde
• Is Part Of: International journal of cancer. Volume 142:Issue 2(2018)
• Page Start: 230
• Page End: 237
• Publication Date: 2017-10-16
• Subjects: red meat -- processed meat -- breast cancer -- prostate cancer -- prospective study; Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 616.994
• DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7136

Abstract

Abstract : The International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO‐IARC) classified red meat and processed meat as probably carcinogenic and carcinogenic for humans, respectively. These conclusions were mainly based on studies concerning colorectal cancer, but scientific evidence is still limited for other cancer locations. In this study, we investigated the prospective associations between red and processed meat intakes and overall, breast, and prostate cancer risk. This prospective study included 61, 476 men and women of the French NutriNet‐Santé cohort (2009–2015) aged ≥35 y and who completed at least three 24 hrs dietary records during the first year of follow‐up. The risk of developing cancer was compared across sex‐specific quintiles of red and processed meat intakes by multivariable Cox models. 1, 609 first primary incident cancer cases were diagnosed during follow‐up, among which 544 breast cancers and 222 prostate cancers. Red meat intake was associated with increased risk of overall cancers [HRQ5 vs . Q1 =1.31 (1.10–1.55), p trend = 0.01) and breast cancer (HRQ5 vs . Q1 = 1.83 (1.33–2.51), p trend = 0.002]. The latter association was observed in both premenopausal [HRQ5 vs . Q1 =2.04 (1.03–4.06)] and postmenopausal women [HRQ5 vs . Q1 =1.79 (1.26‐2.55)]. No association was observed between red meat intake and prostate cancer risk. Processed meat intake was relatively low in this study (cut‐offs for the 5th quintile = 46 g/d in men and 29 g/d in women) and was not associated with overall, breast or prostate cancer risk. This large cohort study suggested that red meat may be involved carcinogenesis at several cancer locations (other than colon‐rectum), in particular breast cancer. These results are consistent with mechanistic evidence from experimental studies. Abstract : What's new? Red meat contains multiple substances that are potentially carcinogenic, including nitrates, nitrites, and heterocyclic amines. Its consumption, presumably owing to the presence of these substances, is associated with carcinogenic processes primarily in the colorectal mucosa. The present study shows, however, that red meat intake is also associated with increased risk of cancer overall, as well as with increased breast cancer risk specifically. Breast cancer risk was elevated for both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. The findings indicate that red meat intake affects more than the colorectal mucosa and that its restriction could be important in preventing tumors at other sites.