The Associations Between Army National Guard Versus Active Duty Soldier Status and Perceived Burdensomeness, Thwarted Belongingness, and Acquired Capability. Issue 12 (10th March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Podlogar, Matthew C.; Houtsma, Claire; Khazem, Lauren R.; Ringer, Fallon; Mofield, Thomas; Green, Bradley A.; Anestis, Michael D.; Lim, Ingrid C.; Joiner, Thomas E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical psychology. Volume 73:Issue 12(2017:Dec.)
• Page Start: 1682
• Page End: 1691
• Publication Date: 2017-03-10
• Subjects: military -- burden -- belonging -- interpersonal theory of suicide; Psychology -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22473
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-9762

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: This study aimed to examine if levels of thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and acquired capability significantly differed between guardsmen and active duty soldiers. Method: Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to test for differences between active duty Army ( n = 1, 393) and Army National Guard ( n = 623) groups, before and after controlling for the effects of age, gender, race, marital status, level of education, and deployment history. Results: Guardsmen reported significantly higher mean levels of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness than did active duty soldiers, even after adjusting for demographic differences. Guardsmen also reported slightly lower levels of acquired capability, though this effect was accounted for by demographic differences. Conclusion: These findings support the notion that National Guard and active duty soldiers differ on perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness. Additional research investigating sources of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness among guardsmen is needed.