Pyrite Re–Os and muscovite 40Ar/39Ar dating of the Beizhan iron deposit in the Chinese Tianshan Orogen and its geological significance. Issue 1 (2nd January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Duan, Shigang; Zhang, Zuoheng; Wang, Dachuan; Jiang, Zongsheng; Luo, Wenjuan; Li, Fengming
• Is Part Of: International geology review. Volume 60:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 57
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2018-01-02
• Subjects: Pyrite Re–Os dating -- muscovite Ar–Ar dating -- iron mineralization -- Awulale iron metallogenic belt -- Tianshan; Geology -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 551.05
• DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2017.1318721
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-6814

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Awulale iron metallogenic belt (AIMB) hosts the majority of rich iron ores in Tianshan Orogen and has attracted much attention. However, a hot debate exists about the genesis of these iron deposits. Geochronological data are among the few critical evidences to solve the dispute. This study chooses the Beizhan iron deposit to carry out a geochronological research. The Beizhan magnetite deposit, with total iron ore reserves of 468 Mt at an average grade of 41% TFe, is the largest iron deposit in the AIMB. The orebodies of the Beizhan deposit are hosted in Carboniferous dacite and crystal tuff. Four stages of mineral formation can be recognized: an early skarn mineral stage, followed by the magnetite stage, the sulphide stage, and the carbonate stage in order. Pyrite separated from pyrite-rich ore samples yields an isochron age of 302.5 ± 8.2 Ma. Muscovite separated from muscovite-rich ore samples yields 40 Ar/ 39 Ar plateau ages of 304.7 ± 1.8 Ma, 304.5 ± 1.9 Ma, 308.1 ± 1.9 Ma, and 307.2 ± 1.8 Ma, and isochron ages of 306.1 ± 3.5Ma, 304.0 ± 3.0Ma, 308.2 ± 3.1Ma, and 308.7 ± 3.1Ma, respectively. These ages are consistent within the error range and are interpreted as the age of the Beizhan iron deposit. The results, combined with the other latest precise dating and geologically inferred ages, demonstrate that the iron deposits in the AIMB were formed in the Late Carboniferous. These iron deposits are considered to be iron skarn or medium–low -temperature hydrothermal origin and have genetic linkages between each other. They may be different mineralizing manifestations proximal to or distal from a pluton. The Late Carboniferous iron ores and the related magmatic rocks in the AIMB were produced when upwelling of the asthenosphere causes the partial melting of various sources and the formation of a narrow linear extension in the upper crust. The upwelling of the asthenosphere may be triggered by the detachment of an orogenic root zone.