A comparison of axial circumference between superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap and other workhorse flaps in dorsal foot reconstruction. Issue 6 (2nd November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Myung, Yujin; Yim, Sangjun; Kim, Baek-kyu
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery. Volume 51:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: 381
• Page End: 386
• Publication Date: 2017-11-02
• Subjects: Foot reconstruction -- SCIP flap -- ALT flap -- TDAP flap -- axial circumference -- foot trauma -- diabetic foot; Surgery -- Periodicals; Hand -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Orthopedics -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2017.1279621
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-656X

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Management and reconstruction of dorsal foot defects present various difficulties and challenges. The main purpose of this article is to discuss experiences of using superficial circumflex iliac perforator (SCIP) flap in various defects of the dorsal foot region. Methods: From August 2012 to February 2015, a total of 13 patients – nine males and four females – received a reconstruction operation for dorsal foot defects using SCIP flaps (the SCIP group). The defects were caused by trauma ( n = 9), diabetes ( n = 3), and malignancy ( n = 1). The mean age was 43.07 years, which ranged between 19–70 years. Additionally, 19 other patients, who underwent reconstruction operation of the foot dorsum using ALT and TDAP flaps during the same study period, were recruited for comparison. The axial circumference of the operated foot and unoperated contralateral foot was measured, and the difference were compared between all patients, as well as between the two groups. Results: All of the flaps survived after the operation, but secondary procedures were performed in two cases due to partial skin necrosis. The mean follow-up period was 13 months. The mean axial circumference discrepancy of the SCIP group (12.08 ± 2.96 mm) was significantly lower compared with ALT (25.21 ± 3.16 mm) and TDAP (29.88 ± 1.55 mm) groups ( p < 0.01). Conclusions: The authors experienced good results with using the SCIP flap in dorsal foot reconstruction. Reconstruction with the SCIP flap can be a good surgical option, with better postoperative symmetry and minimal donor sequelae, compared to conventional workhorse flaps.