Repairing the harm of victims after violent conflict: Empirical findings from Serbia. (January 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Parmentier, Stephan; Rauschenbach, Mina; Weitekamp, Elmar
• Other Names: Shapland Joanna guest-editor.; Sloan Jennifer guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: International review of victimology. Volume 20:Number 1(2014)
• Page Start: 85
• Page End: 99
• Publication Date: 2014-01
• Subjects: Transitional justice -- war crimes -- reparation -- Serbia -- population-based research; Victims of crimes -- Periodicals; 362.8805
• DOI: 10.1177/0269758013511687
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0269-7580

Abstract

Almost 20 years after the end of the armed conflict in the former Yugoslavia, the debates on how to deal with the past in Serbia are still ongoing. From the very start the international community has put major emphasis on the criminal prosecution and conviction of the persons mostly responsible for the war crimes in the region, both by establishing the International Criminal Tribunal for ex-Yugoslavia and encouraging national prosecutions. In the discussions about transitional justice in the region, little if any attention has been paid to the victimisation of the population in Serbia and repairing the harm incurred during and after the armed conflict. Moreover, the views and expectations of the local population have hardly been the object of any scientific studies. The purpose of this article is to report about the opinions of the population in Serbia in relation to reparation for victims, by drawing on the main findings of a quantitative survey conducted in the country in 2007. It highlights the importance of paying attention to the population's needs and, in particular, material and non-material forms of reparation.