Perspectives and experiences of health care professionals and patients regarding treatments for type 2 diabetes. (January 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gauthier, Bernard; Singh, Sumeet R.; Virani, Adil; Staples, Heidi; Colbourne, Ann
• Is Part Of: Canadian pharmacists journal. Volume 147:Number 1(2014)
• Page Start: 45
• Page End: 54
• Publication Date: 2014-01
• Subjects: Pharmacy -- Periodicals; Pharmacology -- Periodicals; Chemotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.105
• DOI: 10.1177/1715163513506547
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1715-1635

Abstract

Background: Several treatment options exist for type 2 diabetes, but little is known about the factors considered by health care providers (HCPs) and patients in Canada in making therapeutic decisions. This study explores perceptions and practices of HCPs and patients related to add-on (i.e., second-line) therapy for type 2 diabetes when initial therapy no longer provides adequate glycemic control. Methods: HCPs (pharmacists, family physicians, diabetes educators, endocrinologists and nurse practitioners) and patients with type 2 diabetes in Ottawa and Halifax were randomly selected to participate in the study. Phone interviews were conducted with endocrinologists and nurse practitioners and focus groups with the other HCPs and patients. Results and Interpretation: Sixty HCPs and 14 patients participated in the study. Metformin was consistently reported by prescribers (physicians and nurse practitioners) as the preferred initial therapy. Important factors in choosing second-line therapy (once glycemic control was inadequate with metformin) were antihyperglycemic efficacy, risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain, and long-term safety. Other considerations were cost, insurance coverage and patient preference. There were differences within and between HCP groups in how these other factors were considered and in the perceived advantages and disadvantages of each drug class. Some patients expressed anxiety when second-line agents were prescribed, and others felt poorly informed about treatment options. Conclusion: In choosing a second-line therapy for type 2 diabetes, most HCPs placed a high priority on antihyperglycemic efficacy, although there was considerable variability in the relative weight placed on other factors. These findings point to an opportunity for pharmacists to collaborate more actively with other HCPs to ensure that treatment decisions are based on the best available evidence and to educate and involve patients in these decisions.