A critique of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales-2 (CTS-2). (November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A critique of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales-2 (CTS-2). (November 2017)
- Main Title:
- A critique of the revised Conflict Tactics Scales-2 (CTS-2)
- Authors:
- Jones, Richard T.
Browne, Kevin
Chou, Shihning - Abstract:
- Abstract: The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the Conflict Tactics Scales-2, a measure used worldwide for research and clinical practices. The reliability, validity and normative samples of the CTS-2 are considered and compared with similar psychometric measures. The limitations of the original CTS have been discussed alongside the CTS-2. Reliability is considered to be good to excellent by alpha coefficient and the variance explained by differing samples or methods of administration. Caution is recommended when interpreting the CTS-2 in clinical settings. Researchers point toward a five-factor structure to the CTS-2. The importance of appropriate norms is discussed and considered crucial when using the tool in settings where reporting patterns may differ. Difficulties in comparing CTS-2 scores across samples, cultures and countries are highlighted. Overall, the CTS-2 is a robust psychometric measure, although it holds limited clinical utility if it is used separately from other sources of information gathering (i.e. psychometric measures or interview). In order to enhance clinical utility, it should be administered alongside measures or clinical interviews that can provide added context regarding violence in the family. More research is required in diverse population samples, cultures/countries and languages. Highlights: CTS-2 is the most widely used and researched measure of family conflict. CTS-2 is a robust measure of family conflict when used alongsideAbstract: The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the Conflict Tactics Scales-2, a measure used worldwide for research and clinical practices. The reliability, validity and normative samples of the CTS-2 are considered and compared with similar psychometric measures. The limitations of the original CTS have been discussed alongside the CTS-2. Reliability is considered to be good to excellent by alpha coefficient and the variance explained by differing samples or methods of administration. Caution is recommended when interpreting the CTS-2 in clinical settings. Researchers point toward a five-factor structure to the CTS-2. The importance of appropriate norms is discussed and considered crucial when using the tool in settings where reporting patterns may differ. Difficulties in comparing CTS-2 scores across samples, cultures and countries are highlighted. Overall, the CTS-2 is a robust psychometric measure, although it holds limited clinical utility if it is used separately from other sources of information gathering (i.e. psychometric measures or interview). In order to enhance clinical utility, it should be administered alongside measures or clinical interviews that can provide added context regarding violence in the family. More research is required in diverse population samples, cultures/countries and languages. Highlights: CTS-2 is the most widely used and researched measure of family conflict. CTS-2 is a robust measure of family conflict when used alongside other tools. Other measures of parental conflict offer similar or higher internal consistency. Evidence suggests that the CTS-2 is not a significant improvement on the CT scales. The CTS-2 clinical utility is still questionable and further research is required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Aggression and violent behavior. Volume 37(2017)
- Journal:
- Aggression and violent behavior
- Issue:
- Volume 37(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 37, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 37
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0037-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 83
- Page End:
- 90
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11
- Subjects:
- CTS-2 -- Critique -- Family conflict -- Validity -- Reliability
Aggressiveness -- Periodicals
Violence -- Periodicals
Violent offenders -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
302.54 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13591789 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/13591789 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/13591789 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-1789
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0736.284200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5435.xml