A Relational Theory of Earnings Inequality. (March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Avent-Holt, Dustin; Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald
• Other Names: Wilson George guest-editor.; Roscigno Vincent J. guest-editor.
• Is Part Of: American behavioral scientist. Volume 58:Number 3(2014:Mar.)
• Page Start: 379
• Page End: 399
• Publication Date: 2014-03
• Subjects: relational inequality -- earnings -- claims-making; Social sciences -- Periodicals; Political science -- Periodicals; United States -- Social conditions -- Periodicals; United States -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; 300
• DOI: 10.1177/0002764213503337
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-7642

Abstract

Most research on earnings adopts economist's human capital model. In doing so, social scientists, explicitly or implicitly, cede primacy to the labor supply and demand mechanisms of neoclassical economics. In contrast we develop a model that treats actors' claims as the central mechanism generating inequalities. In this model earnings are most proximately a result of negotiation between actors embedded in a set of social relations within organizations, a process we refer to as relational claims-making . Institutional and competitive aspects of organizational environments, as well as social distinctions within organizations themselves, provide resources and constraints on the persuasiveness and plausibility of wage claims by actors. Market mechanisms are not causally proximate to the production of wage inequality, but rather are an aspect of actor's environments with the potential to influence the plausibility of particular claims.