Population‐based cancer survival in the United States: Data, quality control, and statistical methods. (5th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Allemani, Claudia; Harewood, Rhea; Johnson, Christopher J.; Carreira, Helena; Spika, Devon; Bonaventure, Audrey; Ward, Kevin; Weir, Hannah K.; Coleman, Michel P.
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 123(2017)Supplement S24
• Page Start: 4982
• Page End: 4993
• Publication Date: 2017-12-05
• Subjects: cancer -- National Program for Cancer Registries (NPCR) -- population‐based survival -- statistical methods -- Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER); Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: Robust comparisons of population‐based cancer survival estimates require tight adherence to the study protocol, standardized quality control, appropriate life tables of background mortality, and centralized analysis. The CONCORD program established worldwide surveillance of population‐based cancer survival in 2015, analyzing individual data on 26 million patients (including 10 million US patients) diagnosed between 1995 and 2009 with 1 of 10 common malignancies. METHODS: In this Cancer supplement, we analyzed data from 37 state cancer registries that participated in the second cycle of the CONCORD program (CONCORD‐2), covering approximately 80% of the US population. Data quality checks were performed in 3 consecutive phases: protocol adherence, exclusions, and editorial checks. One‐, 3‐, and 5‐year age‐standardized net survival was estimated using the Pohar Perme estimator and state‐ and race‐specific life tables of all‐cause mortality for each year. The cohort approach was adopted for patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2003, and the complete approach for patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2009. RESULTS: Articles in this supplement report population coverage, data quality indicators, and age‐standardized 5‐year net survival by state, race, and stage at diagnosis. Examples of tables, bar charts, and funnel plots are provided in this article. CONCLUSIONS: Population‐based cancer survival is a key measure of the overall effectiveness of services in providing equitable health care. The high quality of US cancer registry data, 80% population coverage, and use of an unbiased net survival estimator ensure that the survival trends reported in this supplement are robustly comparable by race and state. The results can be used by policymakers to identify and address inequities in cancer survival in each state and for the United States nationally. Cancer 2017;123:4982‐93 . Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Abstract : Population‐based cancer survival is a key measure of the overall effectiveness of health systems in managing the cancer burden. The high quality of US cancer registry data, 80% population coverage in the CONCORD‐2 study, and the use of an unbiased estimator of net survival ensure that the survival trends reported in this supplement are robustly comparable by race and state. These results can be used to plan and evaluate the cancer control strategy in each state and for the United States nationally.