Modified lumbar artery perforator flaps for gluteal pressure sore reconstruction. Issue 12 (21st March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Modified lumbar artery perforator flaps for gluteal pressure sore reconstruction. Issue 12 (21st March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Modified lumbar artery perforator flaps for gluteal pressure sore reconstruction
- Authors:
- Yoon, Chi Sun
Yim, Ji Hong
Kim, Min Ho
Ha, Won
Kim, Kyu Nam - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Gluteal perforator flaps (GPFs) are the most useful for gluteal region pressure sore reconstruction. However, application is difficult if the surrounding area has scar tissue from previous operations or trauma, especially with recurrent sores. We describe the use of modified lumbar artery perforator flaps when GPFs cannot be used. Methods: Between May 2009 and April 2014, 51 patients underwent gluteal pressure sore reconstructions with gluteal ( n = 39) or modified lumbar artery ( n = 12) perforator flaps. Patients in the modified lumbar artery perforator group had scar tissue from trauma or previous surgery. In this retrospective review, we analyzed patient age and sex, defect size and location, operative time, follow‐up duration, immediate postoperative issues, flap necrosis, dehiscence, re‐operation, donor‐site morbidity and recurrence. Complications and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results: We found no significant differences in patient demographics, surgical complications or clinical outcomes. There were eight cases of temporary congestion (20.51%) and four of partial flap necrosis (10.25%) in the gluteal perforator group. In the modified lumbar artery perforator group, there were three cases of temporary congestion (25%) and one of partial flap necrosis (8.33%). No pressure sores recurred during follow‐up in either group. Conclusion: GPFs are the gold standards for gluteal pressure sores, but modified lumbar artery perforatorAbstract : Background: Gluteal perforator flaps (GPFs) are the most useful for gluteal region pressure sore reconstruction. However, application is difficult if the surrounding area has scar tissue from previous operations or trauma, especially with recurrent sores. We describe the use of modified lumbar artery perforator flaps when GPFs cannot be used. Methods: Between May 2009 and April 2014, 51 patients underwent gluteal pressure sore reconstructions with gluteal ( n = 39) or modified lumbar artery ( n = 12) perforator flaps. Patients in the modified lumbar artery perforator group had scar tissue from trauma or previous surgery. In this retrospective review, we analyzed patient age and sex, defect size and location, operative time, follow‐up duration, immediate postoperative issues, flap necrosis, dehiscence, re‐operation, donor‐site morbidity and recurrence. Complications and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. Results: We found no significant differences in patient demographics, surgical complications or clinical outcomes. There were eight cases of temporary congestion (20.51%) and four of partial flap necrosis (10.25%) in the gluteal perforator group. In the modified lumbar artery perforator group, there were three cases of temporary congestion (25%) and one of partial flap necrosis (8.33%). No pressure sores recurred during follow‐up in either group. Conclusion: GPFs are the gold standards for gluteal pressure sores, but modified lumbar artery perforator flaps are relatively easy and useful when GPFs cannot be used due to scar tissue. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- ANZ journal of surgery. Volume 87:Issue 12(2017)
- Journal:
- ANZ journal of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 87:Issue 12(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 87, Issue 12 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 87
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0087-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1035
- Page End:
- 1039
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03-21
- Subjects:
- gluteal region -- perforator flap -- pressure ulcer -- reconstructive surgical procedure -- surgical flaps
Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1111/ans.13494 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1445-1433
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1566.878000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5420.xml