Predicting appropriate shocks in patients with heart failure: Patient level meta‐analysis from SCD‐HeFT and MADIT II. (23rd August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zeitler, Emily P.; Al‐Khatib, Sana M.; Friedman, Daniel J.; Han, Joo Yoon; Poole, Jeanne E.; Bardy, Gust H.; Bigger, J. Thomas; Buxton, Alfred E.; Moss, Arthur J.; Lee, Kerry L.; Dorian, Paul; Cappato, Riccardo; Kadish, Alan H.; Kudenchuk, Peter J.; Mark, Daniel B.; Inoue, Lurdes Y. T.; Sanders, Gillian D.
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology. Volume 28:Number 11(2017)
• Page Start: 1345
• Page End: 1351
• Publication Date: 2017-08-23
• Subjects: implantable cardioverter defibrillator -- meta‐analysis -- primary prevention; Blood vessels -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Electrophysiology -- Periodicals; Heart -- Physiology -- Periodicals; 612.1
• DOI: 10.1111/jce.13307
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-3873

Abstract

Abstract: Background: No precise tools exist to predict appropriate shocks in patients with a primary prevention ICD. We sought to identify characteristics predictive of appropriate shocks in patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Methods: Using patient‐level data from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II (MADIT II) and the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD‐HeFT), we identified patients with any appropriate shock. Clinical and demographic variables were included in a logistic regression model to predict appropriate shocks. Results: There were 1, 463 patients randomized to an ICD, and 285 (19%) had ≥1 appropriate shock over a median follow‐up of 2.59 years. Compared with patients without appropriate ICD shocks, patients who received any appropriate shock tended to have more severe heart failure. In a multiple logistic regression model, predictors of appropriate shocks included NYHA class (NYHA II vs. I: OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.07–2.55; NYHA III vs. I: OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10–2.76), lower LVEF (per 1% change) (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02–1.06), absence of beta‐blocker therapy (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.23–2.12), and single chamber ICD (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13–2.45). Conclusion: In this meta‐analysis of patient level data from MADIT‐II and SCD‐HeFT, higher NYHA class, lower LVEF, no beta‐blocker therapy, and single chamber ICD (vs. dual chamber) were significant predictors of appropriate shocks.