Molecular interactions of dioxins and DLCs with the xenosensors (PXR and CAR): An in silico risk assessment approach. Issue 12 (22nd June 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Molecular interactions of dioxins and DLCs with the xenosensors (PXR and CAR): An in silico risk assessment approach. Issue 12 (22nd June 2017)
- Main Title:
- Molecular interactions of dioxins and DLCs with the xenosensors (PXR and CAR): An in silico risk assessment approach
- Authors:
- Verma, Garima
Khan, Mohemmed Faraz
Shaquiquzzaman, Mohammad
Akhtar, Wasim
Akhter, Mymoona
Hasan, Syed Misbahul
Alam, Mohammad Mumtaz - Abstract:
- Abstract: Dioxins and dioxin‐like compounds (DLCs) are known to cause endocrine disruption in humans and animals. Being lipophilic xenobiotic chemicals, they can be easily absorbed into the biological system from the surrounding environments, thereby causing various health dysfunctions. In the present study, a total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken, and their binding pattern was assessed with the xenosensors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in comparison with the corresponding known inhibitors and a well‐studied endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, bisphenol A (BPA). The nuclear receptors CAR and PXR are known to play a significant role in handling potential toxins by coordinating cellular transport and metabolic functions of the same. Among different endocrine‐disrupting chemicals used in the present study, DLCs (PCDFs and PCBs) elicited better interactions in comparison with the parent dioxin (polychlorinated dibenzodioxins) compounds. On comparing D scores of all the compounds against both the receptors, PCDF 8‐hydroxy‐3, 4‐dichlorodibenzofuran (8‐OH‐DCDF) and PCB tetrachlorobenzyltoluene (TCBT) exhibited significant molecular interactions against PXR (−7.633 kcal mol −1 ) and CAR (−8.389 kcal mol −1 ), respectively. Predominant interactions were found to be H‐bonding, π‐π stacking, hydrophobic, polar, and van der Waals. By contrast, BPA and some natural ligands tested in this study showed lower binding affinities with these receptorsAbstract: Dioxins and dioxin‐like compounds (DLCs) are known to cause endocrine disruption in humans and animals. Being lipophilic xenobiotic chemicals, they can be easily absorbed into the biological system from the surrounding environments, thereby causing various health dysfunctions. In the present study, a total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken, and their binding pattern was assessed with the xenosensors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in comparison with the corresponding known inhibitors and a well‐studied endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, bisphenol A (BPA). The nuclear receptors CAR and PXR are known to play a significant role in handling potential toxins by coordinating cellular transport and metabolic functions of the same. Among different endocrine‐disrupting chemicals used in the present study, DLCs (PCDFs and PCBs) elicited better interactions in comparison with the parent dioxin (polychlorinated dibenzodioxins) compounds. On comparing D scores of all the compounds against both the receptors, PCDF 8‐hydroxy‐3, 4‐dichlorodibenzofuran (8‐OH‐DCDF) and PCB tetrachlorobenzyltoluene (TCBT) exhibited significant molecular interactions against PXR (−7.633 kcal mol −1 ) and CAR (−8.389 kcal mol −1 ), respectively. Predominant interactions were found to be H‐bonding, π‐π stacking, hydrophobic, polar, and van der Waals. By contrast, BPA and some natural ligands tested in this study showed lower binding affinities with these receptors than certain DLCs reported herein, ie, certain DLCs might be more toxic than the proven toxic agent, BPA. Such studies play a pivotal role in the risk assessment of exposure to dioxins and DLCs on human health. Abstract : A total of 100 dioxins and DLCs were taken, and their binding pattern was assessed with the xenosensors pregnane X receptor (PXR) and constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) in comparison with the corresponding known inhibitors and a well‐studied endocrine disrupting xenobiotic, bisphenol A (BPA). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of molecular recognition. Volume 30:Issue 12(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of molecular recognition
- Issue:
- Volume 30:Issue 12(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 12 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0030-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2017-06-22
- Subjects:
- constitutive Androstane receptor -- dioxins -- endocrine disruptors -- In silico toxicology -- molecular docking -- pregnane X receptor -- risk assessment
Molecular recognition -- Periodicals
Models, Molecular -- Periodicals
Molecular Conformation -- Periodicals
Molecular Sequence Data -- Periodicals
Molecular Structure -- Periodicals
Carrier Proteins -- Periodicals
572.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/jmr.2651 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0952-3499
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5020.725000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5362.xml