Are We on the Same Page? A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Faculty and Resident Training Needs. (October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Are We on the Same Page? A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Faculty and Resident Training Needs. (October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Are We on the Same Page? A Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Faculty and Resident Training Needs
- Authors:
- Braun, Kelli
Swift, Steven
Beasley, Anitra
Wyatt, Tasha
Toomey, Mitchell
Stepleman, Lara - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: Resident and faculty needs are important in guiding the educational agenda; studies demonstrate that these groups do not always agree on needs. A previously piloted 50-item needs assessment evaluating content areas of feedback, the 15 Ob-Gyn milestone procedures, and simulation was used to assess and compare faculty and resident needs. METHODS: The needs assessment was administered electronically to two academic Ob-Gyn residency programs (located in South Carolina and Texas) in June 2016; all items were ranked on a 5-point agreement scale. Equivalent versions were written to capture resident and faculty perceptions of the training program; results were anonymous and participation was voluntary. RESULTS: Forty-two surgical faculty (52.5%) and 47 residents (62.5%) completed the needs assessment; t tests compared resident/faculty group differences. Both groups agreed on the adequacy of surgical content, however, faculty consistently self-reported delivering feedback at a significantly higher level than residents' perceived receiving it ( P <.05) for 8/16 feedback items. Overall, both groups were least satisfied with training in breech vaginal delivery, 3rd/4th-degree laceration repair and operative vaginal delivery; residents were most satisfied with training in cesarean delivery while faculty were most satisfied with laparoscopy. Both groups agreed simulation can improve procedure performance; no significant differences existed. These findings wereAbstract : BACKGROUND: Resident and faculty needs are important in guiding the educational agenda; studies demonstrate that these groups do not always agree on needs. A previously piloted 50-item needs assessment evaluating content areas of feedback, the 15 Ob-Gyn milestone procedures, and simulation was used to assess and compare faculty and resident needs. METHODS: The needs assessment was administered electronically to two academic Ob-Gyn residency programs (located in South Carolina and Texas) in June 2016; all items were ranked on a 5-point agreement scale. Equivalent versions were written to capture resident and faculty perceptions of the training program; results were anonymous and participation was voluntary. RESULTS: Forty-two surgical faculty (52.5%) and 47 residents (62.5%) completed the needs assessment; t tests compared resident/faculty group differences. Both groups agreed on the adequacy of surgical content, however, faculty consistently self-reported delivering feedback at a significantly higher level than residents' perceived receiving it ( P <.05) for 8/16 feedback items. Overall, both groups were least satisfied with training in breech vaginal delivery, 3rd/4th-degree laceration repair and operative vaginal delivery; residents were most satisfied with training in cesarean delivery while faculty were most satisfied with laparoscopy. Both groups agreed simulation can improve procedure performance; no significant differences existed. These findings were consistent between institutions, although each institution's levels of agreement differed for individual items. DISCUSSION: Although residents and faculty agree on areas of strengths and weaknesses, significant differences exist in perception of feedback delivery and reception. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 130(2017)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Obstetrics and gynecology
- Issue:
- Volume 130(2017)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 130, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 130
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0130-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/01.AOG.0000525736.71553.07 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0029-7844
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6208.200000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5369.xml