Evidence-based best practice is more political than it looks: a case study of the 'Scottish Approach'. (14th August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cairney, Paul
• Is Part Of: Evidence & policy. Volume 13:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 499
• Page End: 515
• Publication Date: 2017-08-14
• Subjects: EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYMAKING -- BEST PRACTICE -- SCOTTISH APPROACH -- SCALING UP; Policy sciences -- Periodicals; Social policy -- Research -- Periodicals; Public welfare -- Research -- Periodicals; Social service -- Decision making -- Periodicals; 320.6
• DOI: 10.1332/174426416X14609261565901
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1744-2648

Abstract

Abstract : National governments use evidence selectively to argue that a successful policy intervention in one local area should be emulated in others ('evidence-based best practice'). However, the value of such evidence is always limited because there is: disagreement on the best way to gather evidence of policy success, uncertainty regarding the extent to which we can draw general conclusions from specific evidence, and local policymaker opposition to interventions not developed in local areas. How do governments respond to this dilemma? This article identifies the Scottish Government response: it supports three potentially contradictory ways to gather evidence and encourage emulation.