Seals and shipping: quantifying population risk and individual exposure to vessel noise. Issue 6 (28th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jones, Esther L.; Hastie, Gordon D.; Smout, Sophie; Onoufriou, Joseph; Merchant, Nathan D.; Brookes, Kate L.; Thompson, David
• Editors: González‐Suárez, Manuela
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied ecology. Volume 54:Issue 6(2017:Dec.)
• Page Start: 1930
• Page End: 1940
• Publication Date: 2017-04-28
• Subjects: acoustic propagation -- AIS -- Halichoerus grypus -- marine stressor -- MSFD -- noise pollution -- Phoca vitulina -- spatial overlap -- telemetry -- uncertainty; Agriculture -- Periodicals; Biology, Economic -- Periodicals; Agricultural ecology -- Periodicals; Applied ecology -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12911
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8901

Abstract

Summary: Vessels can have acute and chronic impacts on marine species. The rate of increase in commercial shipping is accelerating, and there is a need to quantify and potentially manage the risk of these impacts. Usage maps characterising densities of grey and harbour seals and ships around the British Isles were used to produce risk maps of seal co‐occurrence with shipping traffic. Acoustic exposure to individual harbour seals was modelled in a study area using contemporaneous movement data from 28 animals fitted with UHF global positioning satellite telemetry tags and automatic identification system data from all ships during 2014 and 2015. Data from four acoustic recorders were used to validate sound exposure predictions. Across the British Isles, rates of co‐occurrence were highest within 50 km of the coast, close to seal haul‐outs. Areas identified with high risk of exposure included 11 Special Areas of Conservation (SAC; from a possible 25). Risk to harbour seal populations was highest, affecting half of all SACs associated with the species. Predicted cumulative sound exposure level, cSELs(Mpw ), over all seals was 176·8 dB re 1 μPa 2 s (95% CI 163·3–190·4), ranging from 170·2 dB re 1μPa 2 s (95% CI 168·4–171·9) to 189·3 dB re 1 μPa 2 s (95% CI 172·6–206·0) for individuals. This represented an increase in 28·3 dB re 1 μPa 2 s over measured ambient noise. For 20 of 28 animals in the study, 95% CI for cSELs(Mpw ) had upper bounds above levels known to induce temporary threshold shift. Predictions of broadband received sound pressure levels were underestimated on average by 0·7 dB re 1 μPa (±3·3). Synthesis and applications . We present a framework to allow shipping noise, an important marine anthropogenic stressor, to be explicitly incorporated into spatial planning. Potentially sensitive areas are identified through quantifying risk to marine species of exposure to shipping traffic, and individual noise exposure is predicted with associated uncertainty in an area with varying rates of co‐occurrence. The detailed approach taken here facilitates spatial planning with regard to underwater noise within areas protected through the Habitats Directive, and could be used to provide evidence for further designations. This framework may have utility in assessing whether underwater noise levels are at Good Environmental Status under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Abstract : We present a framework to allow shipping noise, an important marine anthropogenic stressor, to be explicitly incorporated into spatial planning. Potentially sensitive areas are identified through quantifying risk to marine species of exposure to shipping traffic, and individual noise exposure is predicted with associated uncertainty in an area with varying rates of co‐occurrence. The detailed approach taken here facilitates spatial planning with regard to underwater noise within areas protected through the Habitats Directive, and could be used to provide evidence for further designations. This framework may have utility in assessing whether underwater noise levels are at Good Environmental Status under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive.