U.S. Army physical demands study: Identification and validation of the physically demanding tasks of combat arms occupations. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sharp, Marilyn A.; Cohen, Bruce S.; Boye, Michael W.; Foulis, Stephen A.; Redmond, Jan E.; Larcom, Kathleen; Hydren, Jay R.; Gebhardt, Deborah L.; Canino, Maria C.; Warr, Bradley J.; Zambraski, Edward J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of science and medicine in sport. Volume 20(2017)Supplement 4
• Page Start: S62
• Page End: S67
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Job analysis -- Focus group -- Questionnaire -- Critical task -- Army soldier -- Physical exertion; Sports sciences -- Periodicals; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Exercise -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- physiology -- Periodicals; Sports Medicine -- Periodicals; Sportgeneeskunde; 617.102705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-2440

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: In 2013, the U.S. Army began developing physical tests to predict a recruit's ability to perform the critical, physically demanding tasks (CPDTs) of combat arms jobs previously not open to women. The purpose of this paper is to describe the methodology and results of analyses of the accuracy and inclusiveness of the critical physically demanding task list. While the job analysis included seven combat arms jobs, only data from the 19D Cavalry Scout occupation are presented as the process was similar for all seven jobs. Design: Job analysis Methods: As the foundation, senior subject matter experts from each job reviewed materials and reached consensus on the CPDTs and performance standards for each job. The list was reviewed by Army leadership and provided to the researchers. The job analysis consisted of reviewing job and task related documents and field manuals, observing >900 soldiers performing the 32 CPDTs, conducting two focus groups for each job, and analyzing responses to widely distributed job analysis questionnaires. Results: Of the 32 CPDTs identified for seven combat jobs, nine were relevant to 19D soldiers. Focus group discussions and job analysis questionnaire results supported the tasks and standards identified by subject matter experts while also identifying additional tasks. Conclusions: The tasks identified by subject matter experts were representative of the physically demanding aspects of the 19D occupation.