Social conflict management framework for project viability: Case studies from Korean megaprojects. Issue 8 (November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Social conflict management framework for project viability: Case studies from Korean megaprojects. Issue 8 (November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Social conflict management framework for project viability: Case studies from Korean megaprojects
- Authors:
- Lee, Changjun
Won, Jin Woo
Jang, Woosik
Jung, Wooyong
Han, Seung Heon
Kwak, Young Hoon - Abstract:
- Abstract: Traditionally, conflict management in construction projects has focused on disagreement among internal stakeholders, such as employer, contractors, and subcontractors. However, as social consciousness and personal welfare demands increase, social conflicts among external stakeholders, such as local residents, local and central governments, and NGOs, have become more critical factors in enhancing project viability. In Korea, these conflicts have an impact of US $70 billion annually on social costs. To alleviate social conflicts and costs, this study aims to propose a conflict management framework based on twenty-two representative public construction projects. This study identifies and frames the various causes, impacts, and resolutions of conflicts through the case history of project viability. Through these findings, five types of conflict scenarios were derived: project termination, early mitigation, late mitigation, project enforcement, and late occurrence. Furthermore, this study suggests root causes, pathway of conflict propagation, and characteristics of each conflict scenario, which will assist project stakeholders in developing sustainable management for conflict solutions in line with each project's unique situation. Highlights: Social conflicts of public construction projects are analyzed. Five types of social conflict scenarios are derived. Root causes and pathway characteristics of each conflict scenario are suggested. Sustainable management forAbstract: Traditionally, conflict management in construction projects has focused on disagreement among internal stakeholders, such as employer, contractors, and subcontractors. However, as social consciousness and personal welfare demands increase, social conflicts among external stakeholders, such as local residents, local and central governments, and NGOs, have become more critical factors in enhancing project viability. In Korea, these conflicts have an impact of US $70 billion annually on social costs. To alleviate social conflicts and costs, this study aims to propose a conflict management framework based on twenty-two representative public construction projects. This study identifies and frames the various causes, impacts, and resolutions of conflicts through the case history of project viability. Through these findings, five types of conflict scenarios were derived: project termination, early mitigation, late mitigation, project enforcement, and late occurrence. Furthermore, this study suggests root causes, pathway of conflict propagation, and characteristics of each conflict scenario, which will assist project stakeholders in developing sustainable management for conflict solutions in line with each project's unique situation. Highlights: Social conflicts of public construction projects are analyzed. Five types of social conflict scenarios are derived. Root causes and pathway characteristics of each conflict scenario are suggested. Sustainable management for conflict solutions are discussed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of project management. Volume 35:Issue 8(2017)
- Journal:
- International journal of project management
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Issue 8(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 8 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0035-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 1683
- Page End:
- 1696
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11
- Subjects:
- Social conflict -- Sustainable project -- Urban development -- Public project -- Project viability -- Conflict management
Project management -- Periodicals
Network analysis (Planning) -- Periodicals
658.40405 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02637863 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.011 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0263-7863
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.487100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5318.xml