Irish and New Zealand Midwives' expertise at preserving the perineum intact (the MEPPI study): Perspectives on preparations for birth. (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smith, Valerie; Guilliland, Karen; Dixon, Lesley; Reilly, Mary; Keegan, Caroline; McCann, Colette; Begley, Cecily
• Is Part Of: Midwifery. Volume 55(2017)
• Page Start: 83
• Page End: 89
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: CEO Chief Executive Officer -- IE Ireland -- MEET Midwives' Expertise in Expectant Management -- MLU Midwifery-Led Unit -- MNPO Midwifery and Maternity Providers Organisation -- NICE National Institute of Health and Care Excellence -- NZ New Zealand -- NZCM New Zealand College of Midwives -- OP Occiput-Posterior -- PPI Preserving the Perineum Intact -- SD Standard Deviation -- UK United Kingdom; Midwives' expertise -- Intact perineum -- Perineal care -- Perineal trauma -- Episiotomy; Midwifery -- Periodicals; Midwifery -- Periodicals; Sages-femmes -- Périodiques; Midwifery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618.2005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-6138

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: perineal trauma during birth can result in short or long term morbidity for women. Internationally, rates of episiotomy and severe perineal tears vary considerably. In New Zealand, in 2011, and in a trial of midwife-led care in Ireland, episiotomy rates were found to be considerably lower than those in many other countries. A qualitative exploratory study was undertaken to ascertain how midwives achieve these low rates, in these countries and settings. Design and participants: a qualitative exploratory study was conducted. Midwives expert in preserving the perineum intact (PPI) from two maternity units in the Republic of Ireland and from varied birth settings in New Zealand, were eligible to participate. Twenty-one consenting midwives took part, seven from Ireland and 14 from New Zealand. Methods: university ethical approval was granted. Face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using Ethnograph software and were organised into prominent themes. Findings: four themes were identified; ' Sources of knowledge for PPI', 'Associated factors', 'Decision-making on episiotomy', and 'Preparations for PPI '. Participants drew heavily on multiple sources of knowledge in building their own expertise for PPI. Physical characteristics of the perineum featured prominently as factors leading to PPI. Episiotomy was, in the main, only performed when there were signs of fetal distress. Antenatal perineal massage was supported. Conclusion: this study provides valuable insight into the views and skills of midwives, with expertise in PPI at birth, adding to the body of evidence on this topic. Highlights: Valuable insight into the views and skills of midwives who have expertise in preserving the perineum intact are provided. The expert midwives demonstrated an up to date knowledge of research evidence and have applied it in their practice. The study contributes to the evidence base and has identified ways of minimising perineal trauma at birth. The study provides a precedent for other similar qualitative studies on this topic.