Kinetic study of marine and lacustrine shale grains using Rock-Eval pyrolysis: Implications to hydrocarbon generation, retention and expulsion. (January 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Kinetic study of marine and lacustrine shale grains using Rock-Eval pyrolysis: Implications to hydrocarbon generation, retention and expulsion. (January 2018)
- Main Title:
- Kinetic study of marine and lacustrine shale grains using Rock-Eval pyrolysis: Implications to hydrocarbon generation, retention and expulsion
- Authors:
- Liao, Lingling
Wang, Yunpeng
Chen, Chengsheng
Shi, Shuyong
Deng, Rui - Abstract:
- Abstract: The kinetic parameters of marine and lacustrine shale grains (4 mm) were retrieved by using Rock-Eval pyrolysis in comparison with finely ground powder (<0.178 mm) and kerogen of same samples. Results of grains show remarkable differences from powder and kerogen. Grains of Pingliang marine shale exhibit a relatively broader distribution of activation energies than powder and kerogen while grains of Yanchang lacustrine shale show higher dominant activation energies than powder and kerogen. At laboratory heating rates (5–25 °C/min), the corresponding temperatures to the maximum hydrocarbon generating rate of grains are 3–8 °C higher than powder and kerogen for marine shale and 6–8 °C higher for lacustrine shale, respectively. Extrapolated to geological heating rate (3 °C/my), the corresponding maturity and geological temperature to the maximum hydrocarbon expulsion rate of grains lags powder 0.02 Ro% and 3 °C, as well as 0.05 Ro% and 6 °C for marine shale and lacustrine shale, respectively. After the peak of hydrocarbon generation (Ro = 1%), the retention percentage for grain and powder of marine shale reach 7.33% and 0.09% while those for lacustrine shale reach 16.50% and 10.85%, respectively. These results suggest grains enjoy higher expulsion threshold and higher retention ability. The results suggest that Yanchang lacustrine shale exhibits stronger retention ability and weaker expulsion ability than Pingliang marine shale. The results presented in this study showAbstract: The kinetic parameters of marine and lacustrine shale grains (4 mm) were retrieved by using Rock-Eval pyrolysis in comparison with finely ground powder (<0.178 mm) and kerogen of same samples. Results of grains show remarkable differences from powder and kerogen. Grains of Pingliang marine shale exhibit a relatively broader distribution of activation energies than powder and kerogen while grains of Yanchang lacustrine shale show higher dominant activation energies than powder and kerogen. At laboratory heating rates (5–25 °C/min), the corresponding temperatures to the maximum hydrocarbon generating rate of grains are 3–8 °C higher than powder and kerogen for marine shale and 6–8 °C higher for lacustrine shale, respectively. Extrapolated to geological heating rate (3 °C/my), the corresponding maturity and geological temperature to the maximum hydrocarbon expulsion rate of grains lags powder 0.02 Ro% and 3 °C, as well as 0.05 Ro% and 6 °C for marine shale and lacustrine shale, respectively. After the peak of hydrocarbon generation (Ro = 1%), the retention percentage for grain and powder of marine shale reach 7.33% and 0.09% while those for lacustrine shale reach 16.50% and 10.85%, respectively. These results suggest grains enjoy higher expulsion threshold and higher retention ability. The results suggest that Yanchang lacustrine shale exhibits stronger retention ability and weaker expulsion ability than Pingliang marine shale. The results presented in this study show that grain-based pyrolysis provides a novel method for evaluating the residual oil and gases for shale, which can study the hydrocarbon generation, expulsion and retention comprehensively. Highlights: Grain-based kinetic using Rock-Eval pyrolysis for HC generation, expulsion and retention. Grains exhibit a broader distribution of Ea and higher dominant Ea than powder and kerogen. Grains enjoy higher expulsion threshold and higher retention ability. Yanchang Lacustrine shale shows stronger retention than Pingliang marine shale. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Marine and petroleum geology. Volume 89:Part 1(2018)
- Journal:
- Marine and petroleum geology
- Issue:
- Volume 89:Part 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 89, Issue 1, Part 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 89
- Issue:
- 1
- Part:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0089-0001-0001
- Page Start:
- 164
- Page End:
- 173
- Publication Date:
- 2018-01
- Subjects:
- Kinetics -- Marine and lacustrine shale -- Grains -- Rock-Eval pyrolysis -- Erdos basin
Submarine geology -- Periodicals
Petroleum -- Geology -- Periodicals
Géologie sous-marine -- Périodiques
Pétrole -- Géologie -- Périodiques
Petroleum -- Geology
Submarine geology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
551.468 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02648172 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2017.01.009 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0264-8172
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5373.632100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5348.xml