A numerical study on the cumulative out‐of‐plane damage to church masonry façades due to a sequence of strong ground motions. (14th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Casolo, Siro
• Is Part Of: Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Volume 46:Number 15(2017)
• Page Start: 2717
• Page End: 2737
• Publication Date: 2017-07-14
• Subjects: cumulative damage assessment -- dynamics -- masonry -- out‐of‐plane -- repeated earthquakes -- rigid body spring model; Structural dynamics -- Periodicals; Earthquake engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1762
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2927
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0098-8847

Abstract

Summary: Seismic shocks occur sometimes as a sequence, close in space and time, of destructive events of comparable intensity. In these cases, a significant portion of the damage to historical buildings can be related with the cumulated damage on structures that become progressively more vulnerable. This research investigates the specific increase of damage determined by a sequence of strong ground motions, focusing the interest on the out‐of‐plane response of 2 church masonry façades. The dynamic analyses were performed by a specific rigid body and spring model RBSM, which only accounts for out‐of‐plane damage mechanisms. Two idealized models of façade, each made of 2 different masonry bonds, have been studied by applying various sequences of recorded accelerograms. The results highlighted a complex relationship between the spectral content of the seismic shocks and the characteristics of the structures that change in the course of the loading sequence due to the development of damage. The Housner spectral intensity proved to be a reliable scalar measure of the ground motion destructiveness for these façades. Moreover, when considering a design‐consistent accelerogram that causes a relevant damage pattern, ie, with a significant elongation of the effective first period of vibration, the numerical results indicated a possible spectral intensity threshold below which the occurrence of repeated seismic shocks, both before and after the reference design shock, can be considered as irrelevant. On the other hand, a catastrophic increase of damage should be expected when this threshold is overcome.