Development of a generic wound care assessment minimum data set. Issue 4 (November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Development of a generic wound care assessment minimum data set. Issue 4 (November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Development of a generic wound care assessment minimum data set
- Authors:
- Coleman, Susanne
Nelson, E. Andrea
Vowden, Peter
Vowden, Kathryn
Adderley, Una
Sunderland, Lesley
Harker, Judy
Conroy, Tracy
Fiori, Sarah
Bezer, Nicola
Holding, Emma
Atkin, Leanne
Stables, Emma
Dumville, Jo
Gavelle, Sue
Sandoz, Heidi
Moore, Keith
Chambers, Tina
Napper, Sally
Nixon, Jane - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: At present there is no established national minimum data set (MDS) for generic wound assessment in England, which has led to a lack of standardisation and variable assessment criteria being used across the country. This hampers the quality and monitoring of wound healing progress and treatment. Aim: To establish a generic wound assessment MDS to underpin clinical practice. Method: The project comprised 1) a literature review to provide an overview of wound assessment best practice and identify potential assessment criteria for inclusion in the MDS and 2) a structured consensus study using an adapted Research and Development/University of California at Los Angeles Appropriateness method. This incorporated experts in the wound care field considering the evidence of a literature review and their experience to agree the assessment criteria to be included in the MDS. Results: The literature review identified 24 papers that contained criteria which might be considered as part of generic wound assessment. From these papers 68 potential assessment items were identified and the expert group agreed that 37 (relating to general health information, baseline wound information, wound assessment parameters, wound symptoms and specialists) should be included in the MDS. Discussion: Using a structured approach we have developed a generic wound assessment MDS to underpin wound assessment documentation and practice. It is anticipated that the MDS will facilitate a moreAbstract: Background: At present there is no established national minimum data set (MDS) for generic wound assessment in England, which has led to a lack of standardisation and variable assessment criteria being used across the country. This hampers the quality and monitoring of wound healing progress and treatment. Aim: To establish a generic wound assessment MDS to underpin clinical practice. Method: The project comprised 1) a literature review to provide an overview of wound assessment best practice and identify potential assessment criteria for inclusion in the MDS and 2) a structured consensus study using an adapted Research and Development/University of California at Los Angeles Appropriateness method. This incorporated experts in the wound care field considering the evidence of a literature review and their experience to agree the assessment criteria to be included in the MDS. Results: The literature review identified 24 papers that contained criteria which might be considered as part of generic wound assessment. From these papers 68 potential assessment items were identified and the expert group agreed that 37 (relating to general health information, baseline wound information, wound assessment parameters, wound symptoms and specialists) should be included in the MDS. Discussion: Using a structured approach we have developed a generic wound assessment MDS to underpin wound assessment documentation and practice. It is anticipated that the MDS will facilitate a more consistent approach to generic wound assessment practice and support providers and commissioners of care to develop and re-focus services that promote improvements in wound care. Highlights: 37 of 68 potential assessment criteria were included in a generic wound assessment MDS. Agreed criteria related to general health, baseline assessment, wound assessment parameters, symptoms and specialists. The MDS aims to underpin wound assessment documentation and practice. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of tissue viability. Volume 26:Issue 4(2017:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Journal of tissue viability
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 4(2017:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 4 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0026-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 226
- Page End:
- 240
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11
- Subjects:
- Wounds -- Assessment -- Management -- Audit -- Nursing
Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals
Ulcers -- Periodicals
Bedsores -- Periodicals
Bedsores
Ulcers
Wounds and injuries
Electronic journals
Periodicals
617.1406 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0965206X ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02680009 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0965-206X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5069.540000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5322.xml