Is the Robson's classification system burdened by obstetric pathologies, maternal characteristics and assistential levels in comparing hospitals cesarean rates? A regional analysis of class 1 and 3. (17th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gerli, Sandro; Favilli, Alessandro; Franchini, David; De Giorgi, Marcello; Casucci, Paola; Parazzini, Fabio
• Is Part Of: Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 31:Number 2(2018)
• Page Start: 173
• Page End: 177
• Publication Date: 2018-01-17
• Subjects: Cesarean section -- TGCS -- Robson classification -- advanced maternal age -- hospital assistential level; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Perinatology -- Periodicals; Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neonatology -- Periodicals; 618.2
• DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1279142
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-7058

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To assess if maternal risk profile and Hospital assistential levels were able to influence the inter-Hospitals comparison in the class 1 and 3 of the "The Ten Group Classification System" (TGCS). Methods: A population-based analysis using data from Institutional data-base of an Italian Region was carried out. The 11 maternity wards were divided into two categories: second-level hospitals (SLH), and first-level hospitals (FLH). The recorded deliveries were classified according to the TGCS. To analyze if different maternal characteristics and the hospitals assistential level could influence the cesarean section (CS) risk, a multivariate analysis was done considering separately women in the TGCS class 1 and 3. Results: From January 2011 to December 2013 were recorded 19, 987 deliveries. Of those 7, 693 were in the TGCS class 1 and 4, 919 in the class 3. The CS rates were 20.8% and 14.7% in class 1 ( p < 0.0001) and 6.9% and 5.3% ( p < 0.0230) in class 3, respectively in the FLH and SLH. The multivariate logistic regression showed that the FLH, older maternal age and gestational diabetes were independent risk factors for CS in groups 1 and 3. Obesity and gestational hypertension were also independent risk factors for group 1. Conclusions: TGCS is a useful tool to analyze the incidence of CS in a single center but in comparing different Hospitals, maternal characteristics and different assistential levels should be considered as potential bias.