CT versus MR Techniques in the Detection of Cervical Artery Dissection. Issue 6 (2nd June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hanning, Uta; Sporns, Peter B.; Schmiedel, Meilin; Ringelstein, Erich B.; Heindel, Walter; Wiendl, Heinz; Niederstadt, Thomas; Dittrich, Ralf
• Is Part Of: Journal of neuroimaging. Volume 27:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: 607
• Page End: 612
• Publication Date: 2017-06-02
• Subjects: Vascular disease -- spontaneous cervical artery dissection -- CT angiography (CTA) -- MR imaging (MRI) -- MR angiography (MRA); Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Système nerveux -- Maladies -- Diagnostic -- Périodiques; Imagerie médicale; Neuroimagerie; Neurologie; Système nerveux; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.804754
• DOI: 10.1111/jon.12451
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1051-2284

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (sCAD) is an important etiology of juvenile stroke. The gold standard for the diagnosis of sCAD is convential angiography. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/MR angiography (MRA) and computed tomography (CT)/CT angiography (CTA) are frequently used alternatives. New developments such as multislice CT/CTA have enabled routine acquisition of thinner sections with rapid imaging times. The goal of this study was to compare the capability of recent developed 128‐slice CT/CTA to MRI/MRA to detect radiologic features of sCAD. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with suspected sCAD ( n = 188) in a database of our Stroke center (2008‐2014), who underwent CT/CTA and MRI/MRA on initial clinical work‐up. A control group of 26 patients was added. All Images were evaluated concerning specific and sensitive radiological features for dissection by two experienced neuroradiologists. Imaging features were compared between the two modalities. RESULTS: Forty patients with 43 dissected arteries received both modalities (29 internal carotid arteries [ICAs] and 14 vertebral arteries [VAs]). All CADs were identified in CT/CTA and MRI/MRA. The features intimal flap, stenosis, and lumen irregularity appeared in both modalities. One high‐grade stenosis was identified by CT/CTA that was expected occluded on MRI/MRA. Two MRI/MRA‐confirmed pseudoaneurysms were missed by CT/CTA. None of the controls evidenced specific imaging signs for dissection. CONCLUSIONS: CT/CTA is a reliable and better available alternative to MRI/MRA for diagnosis of sCAD. CT/CTA should be used to complement MRI/MRA in cases where MRI/MRA suggests occlusion.