Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions. (2nd November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions. (2nd November 2017)
- Main Title:
- Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions
- Authors:
- Rangel, Rafael Henrique
Möller, Leona
Sitter, Helmut
Stibane, Tina
Strzelczyk, Adam - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) provide useful information about correct and incorrect answers, but they do not offer information about students' confidence. Methods: Ninety and another 81 medical students participated each in a curricular neurology multiple-choice exam and indicated their confidence for every single MCQ. Each MCQ had a defined level of potential clinical impact on patient safety (uncritical, risky, harmful). Our first objective was to detect informed (IF), guessed (GU), misinformed (MI), and uninformed (UI) answers. Further, we evaluated whether there were significant differences for confidence at correct and incorrect answers. Then, we explored if clinical impact had a significant influence on students' confidence. Results: There were 1818 IF, 635 GU, 71 MI, and 176 UI answers in exam I and 1453 IF, 613 GU, 92 MI, and 191 UI answers in exam II. Students' confidence was significantly higher for correct than for incorrect answers at both exams ( p < 0.001). For exam I, students' confidence was significantly higher for incorrect harmful than for incorrect risky classified MCQs ( p = 0.01). At exam II, students' confidence was significantly higher for incorrect harmful than for incorrect benign ( p < 0.01) and significantly higher for correct benign than for correct harmful categorized MCQs ( p = 0.01). Conclusions: We were pleased to see that there were more informed than guessed, more uninformed than misinformed answers and higherAbstract: Background: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) provide useful information about correct and incorrect answers, but they do not offer information about students' confidence. Methods: Ninety and another 81 medical students participated each in a curricular neurology multiple-choice exam and indicated their confidence for every single MCQ. Each MCQ had a defined level of potential clinical impact on patient safety (uncritical, risky, harmful). Our first objective was to detect informed (IF), guessed (GU), misinformed (MI), and uninformed (UI) answers. Further, we evaluated whether there were significant differences for confidence at correct and incorrect answers. Then, we explored if clinical impact had a significant influence on students' confidence. Results: There were 1818 IF, 635 GU, 71 MI, and 176 UI answers in exam I and 1453 IF, 613 GU, 92 MI, and 191 UI answers in exam II. Students' confidence was significantly higher for correct than for incorrect answers at both exams ( p < 0.001). For exam I, students' confidence was significantly higher for incorrect harmful than for incorrect risky classified MCQs ( p = 0.01). At exam II, students' confidence was significantly higher for incorrect harmful than for incorrect benign ( p < 0.01) and significantly higher for correct benign than for correct harmful categorized MCQs ( p = 0.01). Conclusions: We were pleased to see that there were more informed than guessed, more uninformed than misinformed answers and higher students' confidence for correct than for incorrect answers. Our expectation that students state higher confidence in correct and harmful and lower confidence in incorrect and harmful MCQs could not be confirmed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical teacher. Volume 39:Number 11(2017)
- Journal:
- Medical teacher
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Number 11(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 11 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0039-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- 1189
- Page End:
- 1194
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11-02
- Subjects:
- Medical education -- Periodicals
610.711 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/journal/mte ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1362103 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0142-159X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5531.965000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5284.xml