Can Young Adults Accurately Report Sexual Partnership Dates? Factors Associated With Interpartner and Dyad Agreement. Issue 5 (May 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Can Young Adults Accurately Report Sexual Partnership Dates? Factors Associated With Interpartner and Dyad Agreement. Issue 5 (May 2016)
- Main Title:
- Can Young Adults Accurately Report Sexual Partnership Dates? Factors Associated With Interpartner and Dyad Agreement
- Authors:
- Sanchez, Diana M.
Schoenbach, Victor J.
Harvey, S. Marie
Warren, Jocelyn T.
Poole, Charles
Leone, Peter A.
Adimora, Adaora A.
Agnew, Christopher R. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Sexual partnership dates are critical to sexually transmitted infection/HIV research and control programs, although validity is limited by inaccurate recall and reporting. Methods: We examined data from 302 heterosexual adults (151 index-partner dyads) to assess reliability of reporting. Dates of first sex and last sex were collected through individual interviews and joint dyad questionnaires, which were completed together with their partners. We compared index- and partner-reported dates to estimate interpartner agreement. We used log-linear regression to model associations between interpartner differences and partnership characteristics. To assess validity, we compared individually reported dates with those from joint dyad questionnaires. Results: Most partnerships (66.2%) were 2 years or less in duration, and many (36.2%) were nonmonogamous. Interpartner agreement to within 1, 30, and 365 days was, respectively, 5.6%, 43.1%, and 81.3% for first sex, and 32.9%, 94.5%, and 100.0% for last sex. In adjusted models, longer relationship duration was associated with disagreement on first sex dates; partnership nonmonogamy was associated with disagreement on dates of first sex and last sex. Within dyads, several participant characteristics were associated with reporting dates closer to joint dyad responses (e.g., for first sex date, female sex [54.7%], having fewer sex partners [58.5%], and greater relationship commitment [57.3%]). However, percentAbstract : Background: Sexual partnership dates are critical to sexually transmitted infection/HIV research and control programs, although validity is limited by inaccurate recall and reporting. Methods: We examined data from 302 heterosexual adults (151 index-partner dyads) to assess reliability of reporting. Dates of first sex and last sex were collected through individual interviews and joint dyad questionnaires, which were completed together with their partners. We compared index- and partner-reported dates to estimate interpartner agreement. We used log-linear regression to model associations between interpartner differences and partnership characteristics. To assess validity, we compared individually reported dates with those from joint dyad questionnaires. Results: Most partnerships (66.2%) were 2 years or less in duration, and many (36.2%) were nonmonogamous. Interpartner agreement to within 1, 30, and 365 days was, respectively, 5.6%, 43.1%, and 81.3% for first sex, and 32.9%, 94.5%, and 100.0% for last sex. In adjusted models, longer relationship duration was associated with disagreement on first sex dates; partnership nonmonogamy was associated with disagreement on dates of first sex and last sex. Within dyads, several participant characteristics were associated with reporting dates closer to joint dyad responses (e.g., for first sex date, female sex [54.7%], having fewer sex partners [58.5%], and greater relationship commitment [57.3%]). However, percent agreement to within 30, 60, and 90 days was similar for all groups for both first and last sex dates. Conclusions: Agreement was high on date of last sex but only moderate on date of first sex. Methods to increase accuracy of reporting of dates of sex may improve STI research. Abstract : Agreement on dates reported by young adult heterosexual dyads was high for date of last sex but low for first sex; we investigated factors associated with agreement. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Sexually transmitted diseases. Volume 43:Issue 5(2016)
- Journal:
- Sexually transmitted diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 43:Issue 5(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 43, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 43
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0043-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-05
- Subjects:
- Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals
Sexual health -- Periodicals
616.951005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00007435-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.stdjournal.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000428 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0148-5717
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8254.486500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5265.xml