A Video to Improve Patient and Surrogate Understanding of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Choices in the ICU: A Randomized Controlled Trial*. Issue 3 (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilson, Michael E.; Krupa, Artur; Hinds, Richard F.; Litell, John M.; Swetz, Keith M.; Akhoundi, Abbasali; Kashyap, Rahul; Gajic, Ognjen; Kashani, Kianoush
• Is Part Of: Critical care medicine. Volume 43:Issue 3(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: attitudes -- cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- communication -- decision making -- health knowledge -- patient education -- practice; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000749
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-3493

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To determine if a video depicting cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation preference options would improve knowledge and decision making among patients and surrogates in the ICU. Design: Randomized, unblinded trial. Setting: Single medical ICU. Patients: Patients and surrogate decision makers in the ICU. Interventions: The usual care group received a standard pamphlet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation preference options plus routine code status discussions with clinicians. The video group received usual care plus an 8-minute video that depicted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, showed a simulated hospital code, and explained resuscitation preference options. Measurements and Main Results: One hundred three patients and surrogates were randomized to usual care. One hundred five patients and surrogates were randomized to video plus usual care. Median total knowledge scores (0–15 points possible for correct answers) in the video group were 13 compared with 10 in the usual care group, p value of less than 0.0001. Video group participants had higher rates of understanding the purpose of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation options and terminology and could correctly name components of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. No statistically significant differences in documented resuscitation preferences following the interventions were found between the two groups, although the trial was underpowered to detect such differences. A majority of participants felt that the video was helpful in cardiopulmonary resuscitation decision making (98%) and would recommend the video to others (99%). Conclusions: A video depicting cardiopulmonary resuscitation and explaining resuscitation preference options was associated with improved knowledge of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation options and cardiopulmonary resuscitation terminology among patients and surrogate decision makers in the ICU, compared with receiving a pamphlet on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Patients and surrogates found the video helpful in decision making and would recommend the video to others.