A Better Alternative to Non-parametric Approaches for Adjusting for Covariate Measurement Errors in Logistic Regression. Issue 8 (13th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hossain, Shahadut; Hoque, Zahirul; Hasan, A. H. M. Saidul
• Is Part Of: Communications in statistics. Volume 45:Issue 8(2016)
• Page Start: 2659
• Page End: 2677
• Publication Date: 2016-09-13
• Subjects: Exposure model -- Measurement error -- Model misspecification; Primary 62 -- Secondary 62F15; Mathematical statistics -- Periodicals; Mathematical statistics -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; 519.5
• DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2014.917675
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-0918

Abstract

Abstract : In this article, we propose a flexible parametric (FP) approach for adjusting for covariate measurement errors in regression that can accommodate replicated measurements on the surrogate (mismeasured) version of the unobserved true covariate on all the study subjects or on a sub-sample of the study subjects as error assessment data. We utilize the general framework of the FP approach proposed by Hossain and Gustafson in 2009 for adjusting for covariate measurement errors in regression. The FP approach is then compared with the existing non-parametric approaches when error assessment data are available on the entire sample of the study subjects (complete error assessment data) considering covariate measurement error in a multiple logistic regression model. We also developed the FP approach when error assessment data are available on a sub-sample of the study subjects (partial error assessment data) and investigated its performance using both simulated and real life data. Simulation results reveal that, in comparable situations, the FP approach performs as good as or better than the competing non-parametric approaches in eliminating the bias that arises in the estimated regression parameters due to covariate measurement errors. Also, it results in better efficiency of the estimated parameters. Finally, the FP approach is found to perform adequately well in terms of bias correction, confidence coverage, and in achieving appropriate statistical power under partial error assessment data.