The use of an institutional pediatric abdominal trauma protocol improves resource use. Issue 1 (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fallon, Sara C.; Delemos, David; Akinkuotu, Adesola; Christopher, Daniel; Naik-Mathuria, Bindi J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. Volume 80:Issue 1(2016:Jan.)
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: Computed tomography -- pediatric trauma -- blunt abdominal trauma -- trauma protocol -- quality improvement; Surgical intensive care -- Periodicals; Surgical emergencies -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.026
• DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000712
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2163-0755

Abstract

Abstract : BACKGROUND: A novel protocol to standardize the emergency center (EC) management of abdominal trauma in children was developed and implemented at our trauma center. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether this protocol improved patient safety by decreasing unnecessary computed tomography (CT) radiation and improved quality of care by decreasing EC length of stay (LOS) and laboratory costs. METHODS: We performed a prospective, longitudinal study of children who presented to the EC with a mechanism for abdominal trauma and received an abdominal CT scan from January 2011 to September 2014. Patients were divided into protocol periods: preimplementation (January 2011 to December 2011), Postimplementation 1 (January 2012 to August 2013), and Postimplementation 2 (September 2013 to September 2014). Outcome measures included protocol adherence, rates of clinically positive CT results, the EC LOS, and the cost of laboratory studies. χ 2 and analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 117 patients in the preimplementation, 148 patients in the Postimplementation 1, and 56 patients in the Postimplementation 2 periods were identified. Protocol adherence improved from 70% to 82% ( p = 0.11) from the Postimplementation 1 to Postimplementation 2 periods. The rate of positive CT scan results increased from 23% to 31% to 46% ( p = 0.003) from preimplementation to Postimplementation 1 and Postimplementation 2, respectively. When the protocol was followed, the proportion of clinically significant scans was higher than when it was not followed (31% vs. 8%, p = 0.001). The EC LOS was unchanged (median [range], 271 minutes [16–1, 039 minutes] vs. 233 minutes [40–1, 396 minutes], p = 0.34). The median cost of laboratory studies remained the same from preimplementation to Postimplementation 1 ($166 [$0–$454] vs. $352 [$0–$448], p = 0.29) and decreased after the second protocol revision included an emphasis on laboratory work in Postimplementation 2 ($139 [$33–$426], p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The use of an institutional abdominal trauma management algorithm is an effective method of improving resource use by decreasing unnecessary CT scan use and laboratory costs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic analysis, level IV; therapeutic/care management study, level IV. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text.