Radiofrequency endometrial ablation for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding among women at high surgical risk. Issue 2 (16th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fischer, Friederike; Klapdor, Rüdiger; Gruessner, Susanne; Ziert, Yvonne; Hillemanns, Peter; Hertel, Hermann
• Is Part Of: International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. Volume 131:Issue 2(2015:Nov.)
• Page Start: 123
• Page End: 128
• Publication Date: 2015-08-16
• Subjects: Heavy menstrual bleeding -- High surgical risk -- Quality of life -- Radiofrequency endometrial ablation; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 618
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.05.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0020-7292

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate quality of life (QoL) after radiofrequency endometrial ablation (RFEA) for heavy menstrual bleeding among women at high surgical risk. Methods: An observational study was undertaken among women aged at least 18 years who underwent RFEA at Hanover Medical School, Germany, between June 2010 and November 2012. A validated menorrhagia outcomes questionnaire (MOQ) was used to evaluate QoL and global outcomes among patients at high risk and low risk of complications after major surgery. The high‐risk group included women with anemia, coagulopathy, anticoagulation, thromboembolism, transplantation, malignancy, severe cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, and obesity. Results: Overall, 235 women underwent RFEA during the study period. Median follow‐up was 13 months (range 3–30). Questionnaire responses were received from 202 (86.0%) women, including 132 (65.3%) high‐risk patients. The MOQ total outcome (mean difference 2.0; P = 0.166) and QoL/satisfaction (mean difference 0.8; P = 0.601) scores were similar in the two groups. Success (i.e. symptom relief and no further surgery) was recorded for 119 (90.2%) patients in the high‐risk group and 67 (95.7%) patients in the low‐risk group ( P = 0.155). Conclusion: RFEA improved QoL and achieved a high rate of satisfaction for both high‐ and low‐risk patients. RFEA offers a less invasive alternative to hysterectomy and its associated perioperative risks, particularly among high‐risk patients.