On Public Action: Rhetoric, Opinion, and Glory in Hannah Arendt's The Human Condition. Issue 2 (19th September 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Norris, Andrew
• Is Part Of: Critical horizons. Volume 14:Issue 2(2013)
• Page Start: 200
• Page End: 224
• Publication Date: 2013-09-19
• Subjects: Arendt -- Cavell -- doxa -- glory -- greatness -- Heidegger -- judgment -- opinion -- Orwell -- political -- reality -- rhetoric -- Socrates -- speech -- Thucydides; Critical theory -- Periodicals; 142.05
• DOI: 10.1179/1440991713Z.0000000004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-9917

Abstract

Abstract : This essay explores Hannah Arendt's contribution to our understanding of the rhetorical as opposed to the aesthetic quality of public speech, with an emphasis upon her conception of opinion and glory. Arendt's focus on the revelatory quality of public action in speech is widely understood to preclude or seriously limit its communicative aspect. I argue that this is a misunderstanding, and that accepting it would reduce speech not merely to the discussion of a sharply limited set of topics, but to no topics at all. Public action is speech that reveals the speaker as "answering, talking back and measuring up to whatever happened or was done." Such revelatory speech is most appropriately judged by the standard of the glorious and the inglorious. Because such speech must inform as well as reveals, so does glorious or great speech rise to the level of greatness in part because of what is said, to whom, where, and how. Arendt's understanding of this is shown to have significant parallels to the ordinary language philosophy of Stanley Cavell.