Structural studies of domain movement in active‐site mutants of porphobilinogen deaminase from Bacillus megaterium. Issue 11 (2nd November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guo, Jingxu; Erskine, Peter; Coker, Alun R.; Wood, Steve P.; Cooper, Jonathan B.
• Is Part Of: Acta crystallographica. Volume 73:Issue 11(2017:Nov.)
• Page Start: 612
• Page End: 620
• Publication Date: 2017-11-02
• Subjects: protein crystallography -- structural biology -- porphobilinogen deaminase -- Bacillus megaterium -- tetrapyrrole biosynthesis; Crystallography -- Periodicals; Crystals -- Periodicals; 548
• DOI: 10.1107/S2053230X17015436
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2053-230X

Abstract

Abstract : Three mutants of B. megaterium porphobilinogen deaminase that affect a key catalytic residue (Asp82) have been analysed. Comparison with the wild‐type enzyme shows significant domain movements and suggests that the enzyme adopts `open' and `closed' conformations in response to substrate binding. Abstract : The enzyme porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD) is one of the key enzymes in tetrapyrrole biosynthesis. It catalyses the formation of a linear tetrapyrrole from four molecules of the substrate porphobilinogen (PBG). It has a dipyrromethane cofactor (DPM) in the active site which is covalently linked to a conserved cysteine residue through a thioether bridge. The substrate molecules are linked to the cofactor in a stepwise head‐to‐tail manner during the reaction, which is catalysed by a conserved aspartate residue: Asp82 in the B. megaterium enzyme. Three mutations have been made affecting Asp82 (D82A, D82E and D82N) and their crystal structures have been determined at resolutions of 2.7, 1.8 and 1.9 Å, respectively. These structures reveal that whilst the D82E mutant possesses the DPM cofactor, in the D82N and D82A mutants the cofactor is likely to be missing, incompletely assembled or disordered. Comparison of the mutant PBGD structures with that of the wild‐type enzyme shows that there are significant domain movements and suggests that the enzyme adopts `open' and `closed' conformations, potentially in response to substrate binding.