Predictors of self-harm in male inmates. Issue 1 (12th March 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jane Barton, Jennifer; Meade, Tanya; Cumming, Steven; Samuels, Anthony
• Is Part Of: Journal of criminal psychology. Volume 4:Issue 1(2014)
• Page Start: 2
• Page End: 18
• Publication Date: 2014-03-12
• Subjects: Self-harm -- Inmates -- Non-suicidal self-injury -- Predictors -- State/trait -- Suicide attempts; Criminal psychology -- Periodicals; Criminal investigation -- Periodicals; Criminal behavior, Prediction of -- Periodicals; 364.3
• DOI: 10.1108/JCP-12-2013-0032
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2009-3829

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to examine the predictors of self-harm in male inmates. Design/methodology/approach: – Male inmates with and without a background of self-harm (i.e. suicidal and non-suicidal) were compared across two distal (static and trait) and two proximal (environmental and current/state psychological) domains. The factors from the four domains which may accurately classify self-harm history were also examined. Findings: – The two groups were significantly different across the four domains, particularly on psychological characteristics. The self-harm group was associated with childhood trauma, violent offences, institutional misconducts and lower levels of social support significantly more than the non-self-harm group. Being single, childhood abuse, impulsivity, antisocial personality disorder and global psychopathology were the five key predictors that contributed to 87.4 per cent of all cases being correctly classified. Practical implications: – The high levels of psychiatric morbidity and childhood trauma in the self-harm group indicated a need for interventions that address emotional and interpersonal difficulties and optimization of adaptive coping skills. Also, interventions may require a focus on the behavioural functions. Originality/value: – A novel approach was taken to the grouping of the variables. A comprehensive range of variables, was assessed simultaneously, including some not previously considered indicators, and in an understudied population, Australian male inmates. The lower levels of agreeableness, conscientiousness and generalized anxiety disorder which distinguished the self-harm and non-self-harm group, were newly identified for self-harm.