A Prospective Study of Pain Reduction and Knee Dysfunction Comparing Femoral Skeletal Traction and Splinting in Adult Trauma Patients. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Prospective Study of Pain Reduction and Knee Dysfunction Comparing Femoral Skeletal Traction and Splinting in Adult Trauma Patients. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- A Prospective Study of Pain Reduction and Knee Dysfunction Comparing Femoral Skeletal Traction and Splinting in Adult Trauma Patients
- Authors:
- Bumpass, David B.
Ricci, William M.
McAndrew, Christopher M.
Gardner, Michael J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: To determine if distal femoral traction pins result in knee dysfunction in patients with femoral or pelvic fracture, and to determine if skeletal traction relieves pain more effectively than splinting for femoral shaft fractures. Design: Prospective cohort trial. Setting: Level I urban trauma center. Patients/Participants: One hundred twenty adult patients with femoral shaft, acetabular, and unstable pelvic fractures. Intervention: Patients with femoral shaft fractures were placed into distal femoral skeletal traction or a long-leg splint, based on an attending-specific protocol. Patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures with instability or intraarticular bone fragments were placed into skeletal traction. Main Outcome Measurements: An initial Lysholm knee survey was administered to assess preinjury knee pain and function; the survey was repeated at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Also, a 10-point visual analog scale was used to document pain immediately before, during, and immediately after fracture immobilization with traction or splinting. Results: Thirty-five patients (29%) were immobilized with a long-leg splint, and 85 (71%) were immobilized with a distal femoral traction pin. Eighty-four patients (70%) completed a 6-month follow-up. Lysholm scores decreased by a mean 9.3 points from preinjury baseline to 6 months postinjury in the entire cohort ( P < 0.01); no significant differences were found between the splint and traction pin groups.Abstract : Objectives: To determine if distal femoral traction pins result in knee dysfunction in patients with femoral or pelvic fracture, and to determine if skeletal traction relieves pain more effectively than splinting for femoral shaft fractures. Design: Prospective cohort trial. Setting: Level I urban trauma center. Patients/Participants: One hundred twenty adult patients with femoral shaft, acetabular, and unstable pelvic fractures. Intervention: Patients with femoral shaft fractures were placed into distal femoral skeletal traction or a long-leg splint, based on an attending-specific protocol. Patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures with instability or intraarticular bone fragments were placed into skeletal traction. Main Outcome Measurements: An initial Lysholm knee survey was administered to assess preinjury knee pain and function; the survey was repeated at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. Also, a 10-point visual analog scale was used to document pain immediately before, during, and immediately after fracture immobilization with traction or splinting. Results: Thirty-five patients (29%) were immobilized with a long-leg splint, and 85 (71%) were immobilized with a distal femoral traction pin. Eighty-four patients (70%) completed a 6-month follow-up. Lysholm scores decreased by a mean 9.3 points from preinjury baseline to 6 months postinjury in the entire cohort ( P < 0.01); no significant differences were found between the splint and traction pin groups. During application of immobilization, visual analog scale pain scores were significantly lower in traction patients as compared with splinted patients (mean, 1.9 points less, P < 0.01). Traction pins caused no infections, neurovascular injuries, or iatrogenic fractures. Conclusions: Distal femoral skeletal traction does not result in detectable knee dysfunction at 6 months after insertion, and results in less pain during and after immobilization than long-leg splinting. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma. Volume 29:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0029-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- skeletal traction -- preoperative fracture stabilization -- long-leg splinting -- Lysholm score -- femoral fracture
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Wounds and Injuries -- therapy -- Periodicals
Periodicals
617.47044 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jorthotrauma/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.jorthotrauma.com ↗
http://cufts2.lib.sfu.ca/CJDB/BVAS/journal/149202 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00005131-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000202 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0890-5339
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5027.675000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5173.xml