Endoscopy Following Pediatric Intestinal Transplant. Issue 6 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yeh, Joanna; Ngo, Khiet D.; Wozniak, Laura J.; Vargas, Jorge H.; Marcus, Elizabeth A.; McDiarmid, Sue V.; Farmer, Douglas G.; Venick, Robert S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Volume 61:Issue 6(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: colonoscopy -- enteroscopy -- ileoscopy -- intestinal transplant -- pediatric endoscopy; Children -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Pediatric gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Infants -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition disorders in children -- Periodicals; Child Nutrition -- Periodicals; Digestive System -- growth & development -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals; Infant Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition Disorders -- Periodicals; Child; 618.923
• DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000871
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-2116

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives: Biopsies remain the criterion standard in the diagnosis of intestinal transplant (ITx) rejection, and gastrointestinal endoscopy plays a pivotal role in patient management. Herein, we describe a single-center 23-year endoscopic experience in pediatric ITx recipients. Methods: A retrospective review of endoscopy and pathology reports of all ITx recipients <18 years old transplanted between 1991 and 2013 was performed with the aim of describing the procedural indications, findings, and complications. Results: A total of 1770 endoscopic procedures within 1014 sessions were performed. A combination of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileoscopy was the most common procedure (36%). Increased stool output (35%) and surveillance endoscopy (32%) were the most common indications. A total of 162 episodes of biopsy-proven rejection were diagnosed. The first episode of rejection occurred at a median of 1 month after ITx. Of histology-proven rejections, 45% had normal-appearing endoscopies. The rate of procedural complications, including but not limited to bleeding and perforation, was 1.8%. Conclusions: Endoscopy with biopsy plays a significant role in the care of ITx recipients. Multiple procedures are required for graft surveillance, diagnosis of rejection, subsequent treatment, and follow-up of therapy. The gross endoscopic appearance, particularly in mild to moderate acute cellular rejection, does not correlate well with histology. Complex anatomy, complication rates that are higher than patients with non-ITx pediatric endoscopy, and timely histologic interpretation by experienced pathologists are reasons that these procedures should be performed at centers accustomed to caring for ITx recipients. The field would benefit from the development of a noninvasive biomarker to reliably and efficiently detect rejection.