Positioning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Issue 1 (January 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Positioning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Issue 1 (January 2016)
- Main Title:
- Positioning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
- Authors:
- Cracco, Cecilia Maria
Alken, Peter
Scoffone, Cesare Marco - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose of the review: To highlight the progressive evolution of the issue of patient positioning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), explain the history of the prone and supine positions, report respective advantages and drawbacks, critically interpret the past and current literature supporting such arguments, identify the best candidates for each position, and reflect on the future evolution of the two approaches. Recent findings: Positioning for PNL has become a matter of debate during the last decade. The traditional prone PNL position – most widely performed with good success and few complications, and exhibiting essentially no limits except for the treatment of pelvic kidneys – is nowadays flanked mainly by the supine and supine-modified positions, equally effective and probably safer from an anesthesiological point of view. Of course, both approaches have a number of advantages and drawbacks, accurately reported and critically sieved. Summary: The current challenge for endourologists is to be able to perform PNL in both prone and supine positions to perfectly tailor the procedure on any patient with any stone burden, including increasingly challenging cases and medically high-risk patients, according to the patient's best interest. Intensive training and experience is especially needed for supine PNL, still less popular and underperformed worldwide. Video abstract: http://links.lww.com/COU/A8 . Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in theAbstract : Purpose of the review: To highlight the progressive evolution of the issue of patient positioning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL), explain the history of the prone and supine positions, report respective advantages and drawbacks, critically interpret the past and current literature supporting such arguments, identify the best candidates for each position, and reflect on the future evolution of the two approaches. Recent findings: Positioning for PNL has become a matter of debate during the last decade. The traditional prone PNL position – most widely performed with good success and few complications, and exhibiting essentially no limits except for the treatment of pelvic kidneys – is nowadays flanked mainly by the supine and supine-modified positions, equally effective and probably safer from an anesthesiological point of view. Of course, both approaches have a number of advantages and drawbacks, accurately reported and critically sieved. Summary: The current challenge for endourologists is to be able to perform PNL in both prone and supine positions to perfectly tailor the procedure on any patient with any stone burden, including increasingly challenging cases and medically high-risk patients, according to the patient's best interest. Intensive training and experience is especially needed for supine PNL, still less popular and underperformed worldwide. Video abstract: http://links.lww.com/COU/A8 . Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Current opinion in urology. Volume 26:Issue 1(2016:Jan.)
- Journal:
- Current opinion in urology
- Issue:
- Volume 26:Issue 1(2016:Jan.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0026-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-01
- Subjects:
- patient positioning -- percutaneous nephrolithotomy -- prone -- supine
Urology -- Periodicals
Review Literature -- Bibliography
Review Literature -- Periodicals
Male Urogenital Diseases -- Bibliography
Male Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals
Female Urogenital Diseases -- Bibliography
Female Urogenital Diseases -- Periodicals
Urologic Diseases -- Bibliography
Urologic Diseases -- Periodicals
Periodicals
616.6005 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00042307-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.co-urology.com ↗
http://www.co-urology.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000239 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1473-6586
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3500.779500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5148.xml