A Time Trade-off-derived Value Set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. Issue 1 (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xie, Feng; Pullenayegum, Eleanor; Gaebel, Kathy; Bansback, Nick; Bryan, Stirling; Ohinmaa, Arto; Poissant, Lise; Johnson, Jeffrey A.
• Is Part Of: Medical care. Volume 54:Issue 1(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: health utility -- health preference -- time trade-off -- EQ-5D-5L -- value set; Economics, Medical -- Periodicals; Insurance, Health -- Periodicals; Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques; Soins médicaux -- Périodiques; Medical economics -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals; Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals; Personal Health Services -- Periodicals; Gezondheidszorg; Économie de la santé -- Périodiques; Santé, Services de -- Périodiques; Health insurance; Medical economics; United States; Periodicals; 362.10973
• DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000447
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7079

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The 5-level version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) was recently developed. A number of preference-based scoring systems are being developed for several countries around the world. Objective: To develop a value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on societal preferences in Canada. Methods: We used age, sex, and education quota sampling from the general population from 4 cities across Canada. Composite time trade-off (cTTO) and traditional time trade-off (tTTO) were used as the main elicitation technique. A total of 86 EQ-5D-5L health states grouped into 10 blocks were valued using cTTO, whereas a subset of 18 severe states was also valued using tTTO. Participants meeting predefined inconsistency criteria were excluded from the analyses. For the value set development, we used tTTO and positive cTTO values, while censoring negative and zero cTTO values at zero. Models with the main effects presented using linear terms combined with various additional terms were estimated. The preferred model was selected based primarily on logically ordered coefficients, and secondly model fit. Results: Of the 1209 participants who completed the interview, 136 met criteria that excluded them from the primary analyses. The demographics and socioeconomic status of the remaining 1073 participants were similar to the Canadian general population. The preferred model has 5 linear terms for the main effects, a term for level 4 or 5 for each dimension, and a term for the squared total number of level 4 or 5 beyond the first. For this preferred model, the health utilities ranged from −0.148 for the worst (55555) to 0.949 for the best (11111) EQ-5D-5L states. Conclusions: This is the first TTO-based value set of the EQ-5D-5L for Canada. It can be used to support the health utility estimation in economic evaluations for reimbursement decision making in Canada. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.