Worth the "Likes"? The Use of Facebook among Plastic Surgeons and Its Perceived Impact. Issue 5 (May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Worth the "Likes"? The Use of Facebook among Plastic Surgeons and Its Perceived Impact. Issue 5 (May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Worth the "Likes"? The Use of Facebook among Plastic Surgeons and Its Perceived Impact
- Authors:
- Chang, Jessica B.
Woo, Shoshana L.
Cederna, Paul S. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Facebook is the leading online media platform used by plastic surgeons. This study examined Facebook use among plastic surgeons and its perceived impact. Methods: A survey on Facebook use was distributed to two groups of plastic surgeons: 500 with professional Facebook pages and 500 without Facebook pages. Responses were stripped of identifying information and analyzed for statistical significance ( p < 0.05). Results: One hundred twenty-three total surveys were completed (12.3 percent response rate). No respondents with Facebook reported a negative impact on their practice, whereas 57 percent reported a very positive or positive impact. There was no correlation with perceived impact and number of "likes." Perceived advantages of Facebook included facilitation of patient feedback/communication (77 percent) and increased practice exposure (67 percent). Many surgeons (15 to 36 percent) did not follow the direct impact of Facebook on their practices. Some reported that Facebook was responsible for only one to 50 professional Web site hits and less than 5 percent of their new patient referrals in the past year. Estimated conversion-to-surgery rates were highly variable for Facebook users and nonusers. Most Facebook nonusers (67 percent) expected a "neutral" impact, expressing more concerns about unsolicited advertising (51 percent) and wasting time (47 percent). Conclusions: Plastic surgeons tend to perceive Facebook's impact on their practices asAbstract : Background: Facebook is the leading online media platform used by plastic surgeons. This study examined Facebook use among plastic surgeons and its perceived impact. Methods: A survey on Facebook use was distributed to two groups of plastic surgeons: 500 with professional Facebook pages and 500 without Facebook pages. Responses were stripped of identifying information and analyzed for statistical significance ( p < 0.05). Results: One hundred twenty-three total surveys were completed (12.3 percent response rate). No respondents with Facebook reported a negative impact on their practice, whereas 57 percent reported a very positive or positive impact. There was no correlation with perceived impact and number of "likes." Perceived advantages of Facebook included facilitation of patient feedback/communication (77 percent) and increased practice exposure (67 percent). Many surgeons (15 to 36 percent) did not follow the direct impact of Facebook on their practices. Some reported that Facebook was responsible for only one to 50 professional Web site hits and less than 5 percent of their new patient referrals in the past year. Estimated conversion-to-surgery rates were highly variable for Facebook users and nonusers. Most Facebook nonusers (67 percent) expected a "neutral" impact, expressing more concerns about unsolicited advertising (51 percent) and wasting time (47 percent). Conclusions: Plastic surgeons tend to perceive Facebook's impact on their practices as positive, but most do not track its direct effects on professional Web site hits, new referrals, or conversion-to-surgery rates. Plastic surgeons using Facebook are encouraged to monitor these parameters to determine whether its continued use is actually worthwhile. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 135:Issue 5(2015:May)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 135:Issue 5(2015:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 135, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 135
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0135-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001318 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0032-1052
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6528.924000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5113.xml