A Meta-analysis of the Significance of Granzyme B and Perforin in Noninvasive Diagnosis of Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation. Issue 7 (July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heng, Baoli; Li, Yunfei; Shi, Liping; Du, Xinghua; Lai, Caiyong; Cheng, Long; Su, Zexuan
• Is Part Of: Transplantation. Volume 99:Issue 7(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-07
• Subjects: Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc -- Periodicals; Transplantation immunology -- Periodicals; 617.95
• DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000567
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0041-1337

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Previous studies have reported that granzyme B (GZMB) and perforin (PRF) could serve as noninvasive biomarkers in the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR) after kidney transplant. Yet, their noninvasive diagnostic value in clinical practice is still unknown. Methods: To assess the noninvasive diagnostic performance of GZMB and PRF for AR, we performed a systematic search. After reviewing published studies in which both GZMB and PRF were detected, data on the diagnostic accuracy of separate and combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF were pooled. Results: Across 16 studies (680 subjects), summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios, and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. For overall GZMB analysis, the indices were 0.76 (0.71-0.81), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.58 (3.36-6.25), and 0.32 (0.22-0.47), respectively. For overall PRF analysis, the indices were 0.83 (0.78-0.88), 0.86 (0.82-0.89), 4.82 (3.66-6.35), and 0.26 (0.18-0.37), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed similar results compared to overall study analyses. In analyses of combined evaluation of GZMB and PRF, the above indices were 0.65 (0.53-0.76), 0.96 (0.91-0.98), 12.66 (5.83-27.50), and 0.40 (0.23-0.69), respectively, when both markers were positive. The probability of developing AR in kidney transplant recipients increased from 15% to 73% when both GZMB and PRF tests were positive and was reduced to 2% if that were negative. Conclusions: Currently, neither GZMB nor PRF, if evaluated alone, could be a convincing noninvasive diagnostic marker for AR in clinical practice. Combined use of PRF and GZMB post-kidney transplant may be a better choice in AR evaluation to direct allograft biopsy execution and earlier therapeutic intervention. Abstract : This meta-analysis investigates the utility of peripheral blood granzyme B and perforin as markers of rejection in renal transplantation. The results suggest that combined use of these markers can result in reliable and efficient positive and negative predictive values to guide patient management. Supplemental digital content is available in the text.