Single-dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Registry Analysis. (September 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Single-dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Regional Anesthesia: A Retrospective Registry Analysis. (September 2016)
- Main Title:
- Single-dose Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Regional Anesthesia
- Authors:
- Bomberg, Hagen
Krotten, Denise
Kubulus, Christine
Wagenpfeil, Stefan
Kessler, Paul
Steinfeldt, Thorsten
Standl, Thomas
Gottschalk, André
Stork, Jan
Meissner, Winfried
Birnbaum, Juergen
Koch, Thea
Sessler, Daniel I.
Volk, Thomas
Raddatz, Alexander - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Catheter-related infection is a serious complication of continuous regional anesthesia. The authors tested the hypothesis that single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with a lower incidence of catheter-related infections. Methods: Our analysis was based on cases in the 25-center German Network for Regional Anesthesia database recorded between 2007 and 2014. Forty thousand three hundred sixty-two surgical patients who had continuous regional anesthesia were grouped into no antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 15, 965) and single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 24, 397). Catheter-related infections in each group were compared with chi-square test after 1:1 propensity-score matching. Odds ratios (ORs [95% CI]) were calculated with logistic regression and adjusted for imbalanced variables (standardized difference more than 0.1). Results: Propensity matching successfully paired 11, 307 patients with single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis (46% of 24, 397 patients) and with 11, 307 controls (71% of 15, 965 patients). For peripheral catheters, the incidence without antibiotics (2.4%) was greater than with antibiotic prophylaxis (1.1%, P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.75, P < 0.001). Infections of epidural catheters were also more common without antibiotics (5.2%) than with antibiotics (3.1%, P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.43, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with fewer peripheral andAbstract : Background: Catheter-related infection is a serious complication of continuous regional anesthesia. The authors tested the hypothesis that single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with a lower incidence of catheter-related infections. Methods: Our analysis was based on cases in the 25-center German Network for Regional Anesthesia database recorded between 2007 and 2014. Forty thousand three hundred sixty-two surgical patients who had continuous regional anesthesia were grouped into no antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 15, 965) and single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 24, 397). Catheter-related infections in each group were compared with chi-square test after 1:1 propensity-score matching. Odds ratios (ORs [95% CI]) were calculated with logistic regression and adjusted for imbalanced variables (standardized difference more than 0.1). Results: Propensity matching successfully paired 11, 307 patients with single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis (46% of 24, 397 patients) and with 11, 307 controls (71% of 15, 965 patients). For peripheral catheters, the incidence without antibiotics (2.4%) was greater than with antibiotic prophylaxis (1.1%, P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.75, P < 0.001). Infections of epidural catheters were also more common without antibiotics (5.2%) than with antibiotics (3.1%, P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.43, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with fewer peripheral and epidural catheter infections. Abstract : In the German Network for Regional Anesthesia database, 11, 307 patients receiving epidural or perineural catheters and single-shot antibiotics were propensity matched with the same number of individuals who did not receive antibiotics. The adjusted odds ratio for infection, primarily defined as the presence of at least two of the symptoms redness, edema, or pressure/pain leading to catheter removal, was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.8) for peripheral catheters and 1.94 (95% CI, 1.6 to 2.4) for nonobstetrical epidural catheters. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Anesthesiology. Volume 125:Number 3(2016)
- Journal:
- Anesthesiology
- Issue:
- Volume 125:Number 3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 125, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 125
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0125-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-09
- Subjects:
- Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthetics -- Periodicals
Anesthesia -- Periodicals
617.9605 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00000542-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.mdconsult.com/public/search?search_type=journal&j_sort=pub_date&j_issn=0003-3022 ↗
http://www.anesthesiology.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesiology/pages/default.aspx ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001218 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-3022
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0900.600000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5081.xml