A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Paravertebral Block versus General Anesthesia Alone for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Issue 4 (April 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Paravertebral Block versus General Anesthesia Alone for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Issue 4 (April 2016)
- Main Title:
- A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Paravertebral Block versus General Anesthesia Alone for Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction
- Authors:
- Wolf, Omer
Clemens, Mark W.
Purugganan, Ronaldo V.
Crosby, Melissa A.
Kowalski, Alicia M.
Kee, Spencer S.
Liu, Jun
Goravanchi, Farzin - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Paravertebral blocks have gained popularity because of ease of implementation and a shift toward ambulatory breast surgery procedures. Previous retrospective studies have reported potential benefits of paravertebral blocks, including decreased narcotic and antiemetic use. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective controlled trial of patients undergoing breast reconstruction over a 3-year period. The patients were randomized to either a study group of paravertebral blocks with general anesthesia or a control group of general anesthesia alone. Demographic and procedural data, in addition to data regarding pain and nausea patient-reported numeric scores and consumption of opioid and antiemetic medications, were recorded. Results: A total of 74 patients were enrolled to either the paravertebral block ( n = 35) or the control group ( n = 39). There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, procedure type, or cancer diagnosis between the two groups. Patients who received a paravertebral block required less opioid intraoperatively and postoperatively combined compared with patients who did not receive paravertebral blocks (109 versus 246 fentanyl equivalent units; p < 0.001), and reported significantly lower pain scores at 0 to 1 (3.0 versus 4.6; p = 0.02), 1 to 3 (2.0 versus 3.2; p = 0.01), and 3 to 6 (1.9 versus 2.7; p = 0.04) hours postoperatively. The study group also consumed less antiemetic medication (0.7 versus 2.1; p = 0.05).Abstract : Background: Paravertebral blocks have gained popularity because of ease of implementation and a shift toward ambulatory breast surgery procedures. Previous retrospective studies have reported potential benefits of paravertebral blocks, including decreased narcotic and antiemetic use. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective controlled trial of patients undergoing breast reconstruction over a 3-year period. The patients were randomized to either a study group of paravertebral blocks with general anesthesia or a control group of general anesthesia alone. Demographic and procedural data, in addition to data regarding pain and nausea patient-reported numeric scores and consumption of opioid and antiemetic medications, were recorded. Results: A total of 74 patients were enrolled to either the paravertebral block ( n = 35) or the control group ( n = 39). There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, procedure type, or cancer diagnosis between the two groups. Patients who received a paravertebral block required less opioid intraoperatively and postoperatively combined compared with patients who did not receive paravertebral blocks (109 versus 246 fentanyl equivalent units; p < 0.001), and reported significantly lower pain scores at 0 to 1 (3.0 versus 4.6; p = 0.02), 1 to 3 (2.0 versus 3.2; p = 0.01), and 3 to 6 (1.9 versus 2.7; p = 0.04) hours postoperatively. The study group also consumed less antiemetic medication (0.7 versus 2.1; p = 0.05). Conclusions: Incorporating paravertebral blocks carries considerable potential for improving pathways for breast cancer patients undergoing breast reconstruction—with minimal procedure-related morbidity. This is the first prospective study designed to assess paravertebral blocks in the setting of prosthetic breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 137:Issue 4(2016:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 137:Issue 4(2016:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 137, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 137
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0137-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-04
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/01.prs.0000481070.79186.0d ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0032-1052
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6528.924000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5088.xml