Poor outcome prediction by burst suppression ratio in adults with post-anoxic coma without hypothermia. (May 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Qinglin; Su, Yingying; Hussain, Mohammed; Chen, Weibi; Ye, Hong; Gao, Daiquan; Tian, Fei
• Is Part Of: Neurological research. Volume 36:Number 5(2014)
• Page Start: 453
• Page End: 460
• Publication Date: 2014-05
• Subjects: Post-anoxic coma, -- Burst suppression ratio, -- Electroencephalography, -- Quantitative electroencephalography, -- Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, -- Outcome; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; 616.8005
• DOI: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000346
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0161-6412

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Burst suppression ratio (BSR) is a quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) parameter. The purpose of our study was to compare the accuracy of BSR when compared to other EEG parameters in predicting poor outcomes in adults who sustained post-anoxic coma while not being subjected to therapeutic hypothermia. Methods: EEG was registered and recorded at least once within 7 days of post-anoxic coma onset. Electrodes were placed according to the international 10–20 system, using a 16-channel layout. Each EEG expert scored raw EEG using a grading scale adapted from Young and scored amplitude-integrated electroencephalography tracings, in addition to obtaining qEEG parameters defined as BSR with a defined threshold. Glasgow outcome scales of 1 and 2 at 3 months, determined by two blinded neurologists, were defined as poor outcome. Results: Sixty patients with Glasgow coma scale score of 8 or less after anoxic accident were included. The sensitivity (97·1%), specificity (73·3%), positive predictive value (82·5%), and negative prediction value (95·0%) of BSR in predicting poor outcome were higher than other EEG variables. BSR1 and BSR2 were reliable in predicting death (area under the curve > 0·8, P < 0·05), with the respective cutoff points being 39·8% and 61·6%. BSR1 was reliable in predicting poor outcome (area under the curve = 0·820, P < 0·05) with a cutoff point of 23·9%. BSR1 was also an independent predictor of increased risk of death (odds ratio = 1·042, 95% confidence intervals: 1·012–1·073, P = 0·006). Discussion: BSR may be a better predictor in prognosticating poor outcomes in patients with post-anoxic coma who do not undergo therapeutic hypothermia when compared to other qEEG parameters.