Feasibility and reliability of carotid intima–media thickness measurements in nonsedated infants. Issue 11 (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mivelaz, Yvan; Di Bernardo, Stefano; Boulos Ksontini, Tatiana; Prsa, Milan; Vial, Yvan; Chiolero, Arnaud; Sekarski, Nicole
• Is Part Of: Journal of hypertension. Volume 34:Issue 11(2016:Nov.)
• Page Start: 2227
• Page End: 2232
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: atherosclerosis -- carotid artery intima–media thickness -- feasibility -- infants -- reliability; Hypertension -- Periodicals; Hypertension -- Periodicals; 616.132005
• DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001065
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1473-5598

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Carotid intima–media thickness (CIMT) is a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis. It is increased in adolescents and young adults at risk for future cardiovascular disease. However, it remains unclear if it can be considered as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis in infancy as very few studies have been performed in infants. Objectives: Our objective was to assess the feasibility and interobserver reproducibility of CIMT measurement in nonsedated infants. Methods: We measured CIMT in 81 infants less than 1 year of age. Repeated measurements were obtained by a second observer in 24 children. The analysis was performed with semiautomated edge detection software. Measurements with over 95% edge detection over a length of 1 cm were considered as valid. We further compared the measurements using the semiautomated method with measurements using the manual electronic caliper method in a subgroup of 10 infants. Results: Carotid ultrasound recordings and intima–media thickness measurements were obtained in 79% of infants ( n = 64). Mean CIMT of the 64 infants measured by the first observer was 0.44 mm (SD: 0.04). In the 24 participants with measurements by two observers, the mean interobserver difference was 0.001 mm (SD: 0.026). The interobserver coefficient of variation was 5.9%. CIMT measurements obtained with the manual method (mean: 0.35; range: 0.29–0.39) were slightly lower than measurements obtained with the semiautomated method (mean: 0.38; range: 0.32–0.44). Measurements with both methods were highly correlated ( r : 0.87). Conclusion: Measurement of CIMT in nonsedated infants less than 1 year of age is feasible in the majority of infants with good interobserver variability.